ArticleJAMA network open2023
Trends in Survival Rates of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Use of Molecular Testing and Targeted Therapy in Korea, 2010-2020.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plasma ctDNA kinetics as a predictor of systemic therapy response for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The oncologist · 2025Pooled it
- Performance of a multi-cancer early detection test in the randomized controlled NHS-Galleri trial.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting 5-Year Mortality in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using the Korean Central Cancer Registry: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Exploring the effects of tinzaparin and cisplatin on lung cancer cells in vitro.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- Curative-Intent Multimodality Treatment for NSCLC: Will Global Healthcare Systems Rise to the Challenge? A Perspective From the United Kingdom.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Deep-Learning Model for Real-Time Prediction of Recurrence in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multimodal Approach (RADAR CARE Study).JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Rare transformation from lung adenocarcinoma to sarcomatoid carcinoma mediates resistance to inhibitors targeting different driver oncogenes.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Article
- Exploring Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing First-Line Chemotherapy in Limited-Resource Settings.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Racial disparities in non-small cell lung cancer survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025Article
- Non-small cell lung cancer and the tumor microenvironment: making headway from targeted therapies to advanced immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Second-Line Chemotherapy Compared with Immunotherapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Short-term and long-term outcomes of critically ill patients with solid malignancy: a retrospective cohort study.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Article
- Cross-attention enables deep learning on limited omics-imaging-clinical data of 130 lung cancer patients.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- Insights into treatment-specific prognostic somatic mutations in NSCLC from the AACR NSCLC GENIE BPC cohort analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Illness trajectories of incurable solid cancers.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Real-World Outcomes of Crizotinib in ROS1-Rearranged Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
- Analysis of tumor mutational burden and mutational landscape comparing whole-exome sequencing and comprehensive genomic profiling in patients with resectable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
- Three-year follow-up study reveals improved survival rate in NSCLC patients underwent guideline-concordant diagnosis and treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Analytical Performance and Concordance with Next-Generation Sequencing of a Rapid, Multiplexed dPCR Panel for the Detection of DNA and RNA Biomarkers in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Over the past 10 years, treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been continually revolutionized. However, standard clinical trials may not reflect current multiple lines of treatment and corresponding outcomes in a timely manner. Objective: To investigate outcomes associated with new treatment of NSCLC in a clinical setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients with NSCLC between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2020, who received any anticancer treatment at Samsung Medical Center in Korea. Data were analyzed from November 2021 through February 2022. Exposures: Clinical and pathological stage, histology, and major druggable sequence variation, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS1, RET, MET exon 14 skipping, BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, and NTRK between 2 periods (period I: 2010-2015 vs period II: 2016-2020). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the 3-year survival rate of NSCLC. Secondary outcomes included median overall survival, progression-free survival, and recurrence-free survival. Results: Among 21 978 patients with NSCLC (median [range] age at diagnosis, 64.1 [57.0-71.0] years; 13 624 males [62.0%]), there were 10 110 patients in period I and 11 868 patients in period II; adenocarcinoma (AD) was the predominant histology (7112 patients [70.3%] in period I and 8813 patients [74.3%] in period II). There were 4224 never smokers [41.8%] in period I and 5292 never smokers [44.6%] in period II. Compared with patients in period I, patients during period II were more likely to undergo molecular tests in the AD (5678 patients [79.8%] vs 8631 patients [97.9%]) and non-AD (1612 of 2998 patients [53.8%] and 2719 of 3055 patients [89.0%]) groups. In patients with AD in period I, 3-year survival rates were 92.8% (95% CI, 91.8%-93.7%), 72.4% (95% CI, 68.3%-76.8%), 56.7% (95% CI, 53.4%-60.2%), and 28.7% (95% CI, 27.0%-30.4%) for stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. In period II, 3-year survival rates of patients with AD were 95.1% (95% CI, 94.4%-95.9%), 82.5% (95% CI, 79.1%-86.1%), 65.1% (95% CI, 61.8%-68.6%), and 42.4% (95% CI, 40.3%-44.7%) for each stage, respectively. In patients without AD, 3-year survival rates were 72.0% (95% CI, 68.8%-75.3%), 60.0% (95% CI, 56.2%-64.1%), 38.9% (95% CI, 35.6%-42.5%), and 9.7% (95% CI, 7.9%-12.1%) for each stage in period I. In period II, the 3-year survival rates of patients without AD were 79.3% (95% CI, 76.3%-82.4%), 67.3% (95% CI, 62.8%-72.1%), 48.2% (95% CI, 44.5%-52.3%), and 18.1% (95% CI, 15.1%-21.6%) for each stage. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 10 years of clinical data, survival outcomes were improved across all stages, with larger increases in patients with stage III to IV disease. The incidence of never-smokers and the use of molecular testing increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.