Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929345›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2023

Estimated Societal Value of Lecanemab in Patients with Early Alzheimer's Disease Using Simulation Modeling.

Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared, Weicheng Ye, Aditya Sardesai, Henri Folse, Ameya Chavan, Kang Kang, Quanwu Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The value of timely treatment with anti-amyloid therapy for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Amir Abbas Tahami MonfaredEisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA. Amir_Tahami@eisai.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4003-3192
Weicheng YeEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Aditya SardesaiEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Henri FolseEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Ameya ChavanEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Kang KangEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Quanwu ZhangEisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA.
Eisai (United States) · USMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder associated with memory, cognitive, and behavioral deficits, and brings significant economic burden on caregivers and healthcare systems. This study aims to estimate the long-term societal value of lecanemab plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone, corresponding to a range of willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds based on the phase III CLARITY AD trial readouts from both the US payer and societal perspectives.

methodsAn evidence-based model was developed to simulate the effects of lecanemab on disease progression in early AD using interconnected predictive equations based on longitudinal clinical and biomarker data derived from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). The model was informed with the results of the phase III CLARITY AD trial and published literature. Key model outcomes included patient life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and total costs of both the direct and indirect costs of patients and caregivers over a lifetime horizon.

resultsPatients treated with lecanemab plus SoC gained an additional 0.62 years of life versus SoC alone (6.23 years vs. 5.61 years). The mean time on lecanemab was 3.91 years, and the treatment was associated with an increase in patient QALYs of 0.61 and an increase in total QALYs of 0.64 when both patient and caregiver utilities were considered. The model estimated that the annual value of lecanemab for the US payer perspective was US$18,709-35,678 ($19,710-37,351 for societal perspective) at the WTP threshold of $100,000-200,000 per QALY gained, respectively. Scenario analyses of patient subgroups, time horizon, input sources, treatment stopping rules, and treatment dosing were conducted to explore the impact of alternative assumptions on the model results.

conclusionThe economic study suggested that lecanemab plus SoC would improve health and humanistic (quality of life) outcomes and reduce economic burden for patients and caregivers in early AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseCLARITY ADCost-effectivenessEconomic burdenLecanemabPatient-level simulatorQuality-adjusted life-yearsWillingness-to-pay

Identifiers

PMID36929345
PMCPMC10195963
OpenAlexW4327682176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.