Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929292›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2023

Quantitative flow ratio derived pullback pressure gradient and CZT-SPECT measured longitudinal flow gradient for hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.

Neng Dai, Buchun Zhang, Zifan Gong, Zheng Dong, Xianglin Tang, Haojun Yu, Taoying Gu, Shaofeng Duan, Juying Qian, Hongcheng Shi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Neng Dai *Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Buchun Zhang *Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zifan Gong *The Second Clinical Medical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zheng DongDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xianglin TangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Haojun YuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Taoying GuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Shaofeng DuanGE Healthcare China, Shanghai, China.
Juying QianDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Hongcheng ShiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. shi.hongcheng@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Junbo GeDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. jbge@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Zhongshan Hospital · CNFudan University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether physiological coronary diffuseness assessed by quantitative flow reserve (QFR) pullback pressure gradient (PPG) correlates with longitudinal myocardial blood flow (MBF) gradient and improves diagnostic performances for myocardial ischemia remains unknown. METHODS AND

resultsMBF was measured in mL g

conclusionQFR-PPG significantly correlated with longitudinal MBF gradient and △longitudinal MBF gradient when used for physiological coronary diffuseness assessment. All three parameters had high accuracy in predicting RFR or QFR. Adding physiological diffuseness assessment increased accuracy for predicting myocardial ischemia.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHyperemiaMyocardial Perfusion ImagingCoronary AngiographyHeartHumansPredictive Value of TestsTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photondiffuse diseasedynamic SPECTMyocardial blood flowpullback pressure gradient

Identifiers

PMID36929292
OpenAlexW4327546791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.