Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929080›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Statistical and Computational Methods for Microbial Strain Analysis.

Siyuan Ma, Hongzhe Li

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siyuan MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hongzhe LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. hongzhe@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial strains are interpreted as a lineage derived from a recent ancestor that have not experienced "too many" recombination events and can be successfully retrieved with culture-independent techniques using metagenomic sequencing. Such a strain variability has been increasingly shown to display additional phenotypic heterogeneities that affect host health, such as virulence, transmissibility, and antibiotics resistance. New statistical and computational methods have recently been developed to track the strains in samples based on shotgun metagenomics data either based on reference genome sequences or Metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). In this paper, we review some recent statistical methods for strain identifications based on frequency counts at a set of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) within a set of single-copy marker genes. These methods differ in terms of whether reference genome sequences are needed, how SNVs are called, what methods of deconvolution are used and whether the methods can be applied to multiple samples. We conclude our review with areas that require further research.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMetagenomeMetagenomicsSequence Analysis, DNADeconvolutionGenetic polymorphismsGenome assemblyHaplotypeStrain typing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.