Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929078›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Statistical Analysis in ChIP-seq-Related Applications.

Mingxiang Teng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mingxiang TengDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. mingxiang.teng@moffitt.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) has been widely performed to identify protein binding information along the genome. The sequencing protocol is quite flexible and mature to measure different types of protein binding as long as sequencing parameters are properly tailored to accommodate protein features. Two distinct types of protein binding are point-source-like binding by transcription factors and diffused-distribution binding by histone modifications. Consequently, statistical approaches have been proposed to address ChIP-seq-related questions according to different protein features. In this chapter, we briefly summarize statistical principles, approaches, and tools that are widely implemented in modeling ChIP-seq data, from raw data quality control to final result reporting. We discuss the key solutions in addressing eight routine questions in ChIP-seq applications. We also include discussion on approaches fitting unique data features in different ChIP-seq types. We hope this chapter will serve as a brief guide, especially for ChIP-seq beginners, to provide them with a high-level overview to understand and design processing plans for their ChIP-seq experiments.

Indexed as

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingTranscription FactorsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingProtein BindingSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsChIP-seqData interpretationStatistical modeling

Identifiers

PMID36929078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.