Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929071›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Statistical and Machine Learning Methods for Discovering Prognostic Biomarkers for Survival Outcomes.

Sijie Yao, Xuefeng Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sijie YaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Xuefeng WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. xuefeng.wang@moffitt.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering molecular biomarkers for predicting patient survival outcomes is an essential step toward improving prognosis and therapeutic decision-making in the treatment of severe diseases such as cancer. Due to the high-dimensionality nature of omics datasets, statistical methods such as the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) have been widely applied for cancer biomarker discovery. Due to their scalability and demonstrated prediction performance, machine learning methods such as XGBoost and neural network models have also been gaining popularity in the community recently. However, compared to more traditional survival methods such as Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods, high-dimensional methods for survival outcomes are still less well known to biomedical researchers. In this chapter, we will discuss the key analytical procedures in employing these methods for identifying biomarkers associated with survival data. We will also identify important considerations that emerged from the analysis of actual omics data. Some typical instances of misapplication and misinterpretation of machine learning methods will also be discussed. Using lung cancer and head and neck cancer datasets as demonstrations, we provide step-by-step instructions and sample R codes for prioritizing prognostic biomarkers.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMachine LearningPrognosisSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorDatasets as TopicDeep LearningFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleNeural Networks, ComputerProgramming LanguagesProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorCox regressionElastic netGradient boostingLassoMachine learningSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID36929071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.