Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36929056›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Benefit of intravitreal injections in patients with sub-threshold baseline visual acuity: a retrospective single-centre study.

Nina-Antonia Grimm, Sarah Fahimi, Fabian Kück, Patricia Take, Peer Lauermann, Anna Nguyen-Hoehl, Hans Hoerauf, Nicolas Feltgen, Sebastian Bemme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nina-Antonia GrimmDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG Göttingen), Göttingen, Germany. Nina-antonia.grimm@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8639-2046
Sarah FahimiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG Göttingen), Göttingen, Germany.
Fabian KückDepartment of Medical Biometry, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG Göttingen), Göttingen, Germany.
Patricia TakeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG Göttingen), Göttingen, Germany.
Peer LauermannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG Göttingen), Göttingen, Germany.
Anna Nguyen-HoehlDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG Göttingen), Göttingen, Germany.
Hans HoeraufDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG Göttingen), Göttingen, Germany.
Nicolas FeltgenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG Göttingen), Göttingen, Germany.
Sebastian BemmeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG Göttingen), Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the lower visual acuity threshold for recommending intravitreal injection therapy (IVI). The lower limit of 1.3 logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was adopted in 2006 and has been maintained since then.

methodsIn this retrospective study, data from patients with a logMAR BCVA ≤ 1.3 and 24 months follow-up were analysed. We included patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DME), or retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

resultsThe data from 164 patients (nAMD: 107; DME: 15; RVO: 42) were analysed. We observed a significant improvement at all time intervals (0 to 6, 6 to 12, 12 to 18, and 18 to 24 months after initiating IVI) compared to baseline. Across all indications, median BCVA improved from 1.4 to 1.0 within the first 6 months and remained stable within 24 months. Patients received a median of 5 and 10 injections within 6 and 24 months, respectively. Median foveal retinal thickness was 594.5 μm at baseline and dropped to 244.5 μm, 235.5 µm, 183 µm, and 180 µm during the four consecutive time intervals.

conclusionPatients with nAMD, DME, and RVO with poor baseline BCVA may also benefit from intravitreal therapy with VEGF-inhibitors. In the present study, we observed functional and morphological improvement over 2 years irrespective of the underlying macular disease. Those patients should not be excluded from therapy.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsRetinal Vein OcclusionHumansIntravitreal InjectionsRetinaRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsDiabetic macular oedemaIntravitreal injection therapyMacular degenerationOptical coherence tomographyRetinal vein occlusion

Identifiers

PMID36929056
PMCPMC10368577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.