ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2023
Fungicide sensitivity of grapevine bacteria with plant growth-promoting traits and antagonistic activity as non-target microorganisms.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted elimination of latent endophytes improves cryopreservation success in in vitro grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cultures.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Growth-Promoting Effects of Ten Soil Bacterial Strains on Maize, Tomato, Cucumber, and Pepper Under Greenhouse Conditions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Response of Soil Microbiota, Enzymes, and Plants to the Fungicide Azoxystrobin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Exploring the impact of plant genotype and fungicide treatment on endophytic communities in tomato stems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Grapevines escaping trunk diseases in New Zealand vineyards have a distinct microbiome structure.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the capacity of commercial formulations of synthetic fungicides to inhibit grapevine bacterial growth when sprayed on vineyards to control diseases, such as downy mildew, powdery mildew and secondary rots. Fungicide sensitivity plate assays were carried out on bacteria isolated from vineyards that were also identified and characterized for their plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits and antifungal activity. The high taxonomic variability of bacteria screened with different chemical classes of fungicides is one new finding of this study. Seven out of 11 fungicides were able to inhibit the growth of bacteria at a concentration corresponding to the maximum dose allowed by law in spray treatments of vineyards. Bacterial sensitivity to each fungicide varied greatly. Many sensitive isolates displayed PGP traits and/or antagonistic activity. This study shows the potential impact of fungicidal treatments on grapevine bacterial microbiota. The involvement of bacteria beneficial to the growth and health of plants underlines the importance of this investigation. Our data reveal that the control of a certain disease may be possible using fungicides that have no or low impact on natural non-target microbiota. Understanding the action mechanisms of the active ingredients in these products is a priority for the development of new eco-friendly pesticides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.