Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36928848›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neurobiology2023

Drug Development for New Psychiatric Drug Therapies.

M Lynn Crismon, Janet Walkow, Roger W Sommi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Lynn CrismonThe University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. lynn.crismon@austin.utexas.edu.
Janet WalkowThe University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Roger W SommiUniversity of Missouri at Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug development is an expensive, high risk, and highly regulated process. Only about 6.2% of new molecules tested for mental disorders eventually achieve Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. New molecular entities are produced, and extensive in vitro animal testing is performed before they are evaluated in humans. The compound is used in animals to predict clinical effects in humans, and studies addressing pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, toxicology, and mutagenicity are conducted. Human research proceeds in three stages with the ultimate goal of proving that a new agent is efficacious and safe for a treatment of a specific disease in humans. If efficacy and safety are demonstrated in two Phase III studies, then the sponsor can submit a new drug application (NDA) to the FDA. The FDA oversees each step of the process to assure that good research practices are followed, data integrity is assured, and human research subjects are protected.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug DevelopmentPsychotropic DrugsAnimalsHumansPsychotropic DrugsAnimal modelsBiomarkerClinical trialDrug developmentEfficacyFDAPharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsPsychotropicRegulationSafety

Identifiers

PMID36928848
OpenAlexW4327654084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.