Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36928796›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Evolution of research funding for neglected tropical diseases in Brazil, 2004-2020.

Gabriela Bardelini Tavares Melo, Antonia Angulo-Tuesta, Everton Nunes da Silva, Thaís da Silva Santos, Liza Yurie Teruya Uchimura, Marcos Takashi Obara

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Research in Epidemiology in Brazil: challenges, pathways, and commitments for the future.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriela Bardelini Tavares MeloGraduate Program in Health Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Ceilândia - University of Brasilia, Federal District, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6758-0834
Antonia Angulo-TuestaGraduate Program in Health Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Ceilândia - University of Brasilia, Federal District, Brasilia, Brazil.
Everton Nunes da SilvaGraduate Program in Health Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Ceilândia - University of Brasilia, Federal District, Brasilia, Brazil.
Thaís da Silva SantosGraduate Program in Health Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Ceilândia - University of Brasilia, Federal District, Brasilia, Brazil.
Liza Yurie Teruya UchimuraHospital do Coração, São Paulo State, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos Takashi ObaraGraduate Program in Health Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Ceilândia - University of Brasilia, Federal District, Brasilia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neglected tropical diseases are a global public health problem. Although Brazil is largely responsible for their occurrence in Latin America, research funding on the subject does not meet the population's health needs. The present study analyzed the evolution of research funding for neglected tropical diseases by the Ministry of Health and its partners in Brazil, from 2004 to 2020. This is a retrospective study of data from investigations registered on Health Research (Pesquisa Saúde in Portuguese), a public repository for research funded by the Ministry of Health's Department of Science and Technology. The temporal trend of funding and the influence of federal government changes on funding were analyzed using Prais-Winster generalized linear regression. From 2004 to 2020, 1,158 studies were financed (purchasing power parity (PPP$) 230.9 million), with most funding aimed at biomedical research (81.6%) and topics involving dengue, leishmaniasis and tuberculosis (60.2%). Funding was stationary (annual percent change of -5.7%; 95%CI -54.0 to 45.0) and influenced by changes to the federal government. Research funding was lacking for chikungunya, Chagas disease, schistosomiasis, malaria and taeniasis/cysticercosis, diseases with a high prevalence, burden or mortality rates in Brazil. Although the Ministry of Health had several budgetary partners, it was the main funder, with 69.8% of investments. The study revealed that research funding for neglected tropical diseases has stagnated over the years and that diseases with a high prevalence, burden and mortality rate receive little funding. These findings demonstrate the need to strengthen the health research system by providing sustainable funding for research on neglected tropical diseases that is consistent with the population's health needs.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseMalariaSchistosomiasisBrazilHumansNeglected DiseasesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36928796
PMCPMC10019684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read32
reference markers read4
identifiers read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.