Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36928790›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Bell correlations outside physics.

C Gallus, E M Pothos, P Blasiak, J M Yearsley, B W Wojciechowski

Erratum issuedFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C GallusTechnische Hochschule Mittelhessen, 35390, Gießen, Germany. christoph.gallus@w.thm.de.
E M PothosCity, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
P BlasiakInstitute for Quantum Studies, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA.
J M YearsleyCity, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
B W WojciechowskiInstitute of Applied Psychology, Jagiellonian University, 30348, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA8655-23-1-7220ONGR N62909-19-1-200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correlations are ubiquitous in nature and their principled study is of paramount importance in scientific development. The seminal contributions from John Bell offer a framework for analyzing the correlations between the components of quantum mechanical systems and have instigated an experimental tradition which has recently culminated with the Nobel Prize in Physics (2022). In physics, Bell's framework allows the demonstration of the non-classical nature of quantum systems just from the analysis of the observed correlation patterns. Bell's ideas need not be restricted to physics. Our contribution is to show an example of a Bell approach, based on the insight that correlations can be broken down into a part due to common, ostensibly significant causes, and a part due to noise. We employ data from finance (price changes of securities) as an example to demonstrate our approach, highlighting several general applications: first, we demonstrate a new measure of association, informed by the assumed causal relationship between variables. Second, our framework can lead to streamlined Bell-type tests of widely employed models of association, which are in principle applicable to any discipline. In the area of finance, such models of association are Factor Models and the bivariate Gaussian model. Overall, we show that Bell's approach and the models we consider are applicable as general statistical techniques, without any domain specificity. We hope that our work will pave the way for extending our general understanding for how the structure of associations can be analyzed.

Identifiers

PMID36928790
PMCPMC10020465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read4
table measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.