ReviewEndocrine2023
False-positive radioiodine uptake after radioiodine treatment in differentiated thyroid cancer.
Review in Endocrine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- False-positive and true-positive orbital iodine-131 uptake after radioiodine therapy: two contrasting cases clarified by SPECT/CT.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Persistent 131I uptake in the thyroglossal duct after thyroid ablation: A case report and literature review.Medicine · 2026Review
- Importance of performing SPECT/CT in thyroid Cancer patients with central neck uptake in whole body Iodine scan: A case report.Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Oldie but Goldie: The Fundamental Role of Radioiodine in the Management of Thyroid Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Performance of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeFalse-positive radioiodine uptake can sometimes be observed with post-radioiodine treatment (RIT) whole body scanning. Radioiodine pitfall has often been reported as being caused by benign or inflammatory disease, or, in some cases, by tumor lesions. This paper reviews the possible causes of such false-positive imaging, and suggests possible reasons for suspecting these pitfalls. METHODS AND
resultsOnline databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, ISI Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus, were systematically examined, using different keyword combinations: "radioiodine false-positive imaging", "131 I false-positive imaging" and " RAI false-positive imaging". An illustrative case was described. Excluding cases in which SPECT/CT was not performed, a total of 18 papers was found: 17 case reports and one series regarding false-positive iodine-131 uptake after RIT.
conclusionsThe prevalence of radioiodine pitfall was significantly reduced through the use of SPECT/CT imaging, though its possible presence has always to be taken into account. Inflammation, passive iodine accumulation, other tumors, and, sometimes, unknown causes can all potentially generate false-positive imaging. Missing detection of false-positive imaging could result in over-staging and inappropriate RIT or it could lead to the non-detection of other cancers. We examine the reasons for these possible pitfalls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.