ReviewJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2023
Analyzing CRISPR screens in non-conventional microbes.
Review in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in CRISPR-enabled genome-wide screens in yeast.FEMS yeast research · 2025Review
- Application of functional genomics for domestication of novel non-model microbes.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- gRNA-SeqRET: a universal tool for targeted and genome-scale gRNA design and sequence extraction for prokaryotes and eukaryotes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The multifaceted nature of CRISPR screens has propelled advancements in the field of functional genomics. Pooled CRISPR screens involve creating programmed genetic perturbations across multiple genomic sites in a pool of host cells subjected to a challenge, empowering researchers to identify genetic causes of desirable phenotypes. These genome-wide screens have been widely used in mammalian cells to discover biological mechanisms of diseases and drive the development of targeted drugs and therapeutics. Their use in non-model organisms, especially in microbes to improve bioprocessing-relevant phenotypes, has been limited. Further compounding this issue is the lack of bioinformatic algorithms for analyzing microbial screening data with high accuracy. Here, we describe the general approach and underlying principles for conducting pooled CRISPR knockout screens in non-conventional yeasts and performing downstream analysis of the screening data, while also reviewing state-of-the-art algorithms for identification of CRISPR screening outcomes. Application of pooled CRISPR screens to non-model yeasts holds considerable potential to uncover novel metabolic engineering targets and improve industrial bioproduction. ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARY: This mini-review describes experimental and computational approaches for functional genomic screening using CRISPR technologies in non-conventional microbes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.