ArticlePloS one2023
MOPA: An integrative multi-omics pathway analysis method for measuring omics activity.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biochemically Constrained Multi-Omics Integration Reveals Protein-Metabolite Dependencies Across Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- GEDO: topology-based inference of gene module activity in Sjögren's disease.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Multiomics approaches in Kawasaki disease: insights into pathogenesis and emerging directions for diagnosis and treatment.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2026Article
- A review on multi-omics integration for aiding study design of large scale TCGA cancer datasets.BMC genomics · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathways are composed of proteins forming a network to represent specific biological mechanisms and are often used to measure enrichment scores based on a list of genes in means to measure their biological activity. The pathway analysis is a de facto standard downstream analysis procedure in most genomic and transcriptomic studies. Here, we present MOPA (Multi-Omics Pathway Analysis), which is a multi-omics integrative method that scores individual pathways in a sample wise manner in terms of enriched multi-omics regulatory activity, which we refer to mES (multi-omics Enrichment Score). The mES score reflects the strength of regulatory relations between multi-omics in units of pathways. In addition, MOPA is able to measure how much each omics contribute to mES that may be used to observe what kind of omics are active in a pathway within a sample group (e.g., subtype, gender), which we refer to OCR (Omics Contribution Rate). Using nine different cancer types, 93 clinical features and three types of omics (i.e., gene expression, miRNA and methylation), MOPA was used to search for clinical features that were explainable in context of multi-omics. By evaluating the performance of MOPA, we showed that it yielded higher or at least equal performance compared to previous single and multi-omics pathway analysis tools. We find that the advantage of MOPA is the ability to explain pathways in terms of omics relation using mES and OCR. As one of the results, the TGF-beta signaling pathway was captured as an important pathway that showed distinct mES and OCR values specific to the CMS4 subtype in colon adenocarcinoma. The mES and OCR metrics suggested that the mRNA and miRNA expressions were significantly different from the other subtypes, which was concordant with previous studies. The MOPA software is available at https://github.com/jaeminjj/MOPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.