ArticleClinical neuroradiology2023
Deep Learning-based Assessment of Internal Carotid Artery Anatomy to Predict Difficult Intracranial Access in Endovascular Recanalization of Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Classification, detection, and segmentation performance of image-based AI in intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review.BMC medical imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Carotid artery segmentation in computed tomography angiography (CTA) using multi-scale deep supervision with Swin-UNet and advanced data augmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Prediction of prognosis in acute ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy based on multimodal MRI radiomics and deep learning.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based defacing tool for CT angiography: CTA-DEFACE.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) duration is an important predictor for neurological outcome. Recently it was shown that an angle of ≤ 90° of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is predictive for longer EVT duration. As manual angle measurement is not trivial and time-consuming, deep learning (DL) could help identifying difficult EVT cases in advance.
methodsWe included 379 CT angiographies (CTA) of patients who underwent EVT between January 2016 and December 2020. Manual segmentation of 121 CTAs was performed for the aortic arch, common carotid artery (CCA) and ICA. These were used to train a nnUNet. The remaining 258 CTAs were segmented using the trained nnUNet with manual verification afterwards. Angles of left and right ICAs were measured resulting in two classes: acute angle ≤ 90° and > 90°. The segmentations together with angle measurements were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) determining the ICA angle. The performance was evaluated using Dice scores. The classification was evaluated using AUC and accuracy. Associations of ICA angle and procedural times was explored using median and Whitney‑U test.
resultsMedian EVT duration for cases with ICA angle > 90° was 48 min and with ≤ 90° was 64 min (p = 0.001). Segmentation evaluation showed Dice scores of 0.94 for the aorta and 0.86 for CCA/ICA, respectively. Evaluation of ICA angle determination resulted in an AUC of 0.92 and accuracy of 0.85.
conclusionThe association between ICA angle and EVT duration could be verified and a DL-based method for semi-automatic assessment with the potential for full automation was developed. More anatomical features of interest could be examined in a similar fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.