Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36928286›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heredity2023

Genome assemblies and comparison of two Neotropical spiral gingers: Costus pulverulentus and C. lasius.

Julia Harenčár, Oscar M Vargas, Merly Escalona, Douglas W Schemske, Kathleen M Kay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heredity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia HarenčárEcology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6944-4337
Oscar M VargasDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, Arcata, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2301-2800
Merly EscalonaDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0213-4777
Douglas W SchemskeDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Kathleen M KayEcology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8858-110X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spiral gingers (Costus L.) are a pantropical genus of herbaceous perennial monocots; the Neotropical clade of Costus radiated rapidly in the past few million years into over 60 species. The Neotropical spiral gingers have a rich history of evolutionary and ecological research that can motivate and inform modern genetic investigations. Here, we present the first 2 chromosome-level genome assemblies in the genus, for C. pulverulentus and C. lasius, and briefly compare their synteny. We assembled the C. pulverulentus genome from a combination of short-read data, Chicago and Dovetail Hi-C chromatin-proximity sequencing, and alignment with a linkage map. We annotated the genome by mapping a C. pulverulentus transcriptome and querying mapped transcripts against a protein database. We assembled the C. lasius genome with Pacific Biosciences HiFi long reads and alignment to the C. pulverulentus genome. These 2 assemblies are the first published genomes for non-cultivated tropical plants. These genomes solidify the spiral gingers as a model system and will facilitate research on the poorly understood genetic basis of tropical plant diversification.

Indexed as

CostusZingiber officinaleChromosome MappingGenomeGenome, PlantSyntenygenome resourcesherbaceousmonocotsyntenytropical plant

Identifiers

PMID36928286
PMCPMC10212132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.