Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36928269›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2023

Mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer: What has changed and remained unchanged in 25 years.

Kimiko Inoue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimiko InoueBioresource Engineering Division, Bioresource Research Center, RIKEN, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is the only reproductive technology used to produce individuals from somatic cells by transferring them to enucleated oocytes. Although more than 25 years have passed since the first mammalian SCNT was reported in sheep, problems such as low birth rates and morphological abnormalities have persisted and limited its practical applications. The mouse is the ideal laboratory animal to unveil these questions due to its established reproductive technologies and extensive knowledge base of its genome and various strains. We investigated the causes of incomplete reprogramming after nuclear transfer of donor somatic cells and found that the loss of imprint in some placenta-specific imprinted genes could induce non-random SCNT abnormalities. By ameliorating aberrantly expressed imprinted genes, we succeeded in increasing the low birth rate and improving morphological abnormalities observed in SCNT fetuses. Furthermore, we sought appropriate mouse strains and cell types as nuclear donors to increase their developmental efficiencies and expand their applications in various fields. Peripheral blood cells are useful as ethical and economical cell species because they can be collected easily, even though SCNT embryos derived from hematopoietic cells show poor developmental abilities after reconstruction. Additionally, it is possible to obtain mice that are reactive to specific antigens of interest by using lymphocytes. Although there are still many limitations to the practical use of SCNT, its utilization is steadily expanding.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationNuclear Transfer TechniquesAnimalsCell NucleusCloning, OrganismEmbryo, MammalianMammalsMiceSheepGenome reprogrammingImprinted geneMousePeripheral blood cellSomatic cell nuclear transfer

Identifiers

PMID36928269
PMCPMC10267587
OpenAlexW4327640221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.