ArticlePloS one2023
A deep learning-based framework for retinal fundus image enhancement.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adaptive MDA-Net: Degradation-Aware Retinal Fundus Image Enhancement with Frequency-Domain and Illumination Guidance for Clinical Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GMS-JIGNet: guided multi-scale jigsaw puzzles for self-supervised artificial spot segmentation in fundus photography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Real-Time Integration of Optical Coherence Tomography Thickness Map Overlays for Enhanced Visualization in Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: A Pilot Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- FQ-UWF: Unpaired Generative Image Enhancement for Fundus Quality Ultra-Widefield Retinal Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
problemLow-quality fundus images with complex degredation can cause costly re-examinations of patients or inaccurate clinical diagnosis.
aimThis study aims to create an automatic fundus macular image enhancement framework to improve low-quality fundus images and remove complex image degradation.
methodWe propose a new deep learning-based model that automatically enhances low-quality retinal fundus images that suffer from complex degradation. We collected a dataset, comprising 1068 pairs of high-quality (HQ) and low-quality (LQ) fundus images from the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital's health screening program and ophthalmology department from 2017 to 2019. Then, we used these dataset to develop data augmentation methods to simulate major aspects of retinal image degradation and to propose a customized convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture to enhance LQ images, depending on the nature of the degradation. Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), r-value (linear index of fuzziness), and proportion of ungradable fundus photographs before and after the enhancement process are calculated to assess the performance of proposed model. A comparative evaluation is conducted on an external database and four different open-source databases.
resultsThe results of the evaluation on the external test dataset showed an significant increase in PSNR and SSIM compared with the original LQ images. Moreover, PSNR and SSIM increased by over 4 dB and 0.04, respectively compared with the previous state-of-the-art methods (P < 0.05). The proportion of ungradable fundus photographs decreased from 42.6% to 26.4% (P = 0.012).
conclusionOur enhancement process improves LQ fundus images that suffer from complex degradation significantly. Moreover our customized CNN achieved improved performance over the existing state-of-the-art methods. Overall, our framework can have a clinical impact on reducing re-examinations and improving the accuracy of diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.