ArticleScientific reports2023
Research on SPDTRS-PNN based intelligent assistant diagnosis for breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the second dangerous cancer in the world. Breast cancer data often contains more redundant information. Redundant information makes the breast cancer auxiliary diagnosis less accurate and time consuming. Dimension reduction algorithm combined with machine learning can solve these problems well. This paper proposes the single parameter decision theoretic rough set (SPDTRS) combined with the probability neural network (PNN) model for breast cancer diagnosis. We find that when the parameter value of SPDTRS is 2.5 and the SPREAD value is 0.75, the number of 30 attributes of the original breast cancer data dropped to 12, the accuracy of the SPDTRS-PNN model training set is 99.25%, the accuracy of the test set is 97.04%, and the test time is 0.093 s. The experimental results show that the SPDTRS-PNN model can improve the ac-curacy of breast cancer recognition, reduce the time required for diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.