ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2023
High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Is a Useful Biomarker for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients with Systemic Sarcoidosis Regardless of Cardiac Involvement.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic challenges in isolated cardiac sarcoidosis.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Novel clinical application of urinary angiotensin-converting enzyme assay in renal sarcoidosis: a retrospective observational study.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Observational
- Biomarkers and genetic determinants of cardiac sarcoidosis: current status, the unmet needs and future perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Elevated Cardiac Troponin in Non-Cardiac Conditions Unrelated to Acute Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Prognostic role of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis: insights from ILLUMINATE-CS.ESC heart failure · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Cardiac involvement defines the prognosis for patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Despite advancements in techniques for diagnosing cardiac lesions, there remains significant room for improvement in cardiac screening and prognostic prediction. The present study therefore assessed the prognostic factors associated with cardiovascular events in patients with sarcoidosis. Methods We retrospectively studied 132 patients with systemic sarcoidosis and evaluated the clinical data obtained between 2009 and 2022. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations between cardiovascular events and prognostic factors. Results The median age of the patients at the diagnosis was 64.0 (55.0-71.0) years old. During a mean follow-up period of 6.3±3.2 years, 28 patients suffered from cardiovascular events. Patients in the event group had more severe heart failure symptoms, more frequent ventricular tachycardia, higher serum high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) values [0.025 (0.017-0.044) vs. 0.011 (0.007-0.019) ng/mL, p<0.001], and lower left ventricular ejection fraction values than those in the non-event group. These trends were observed even if the patients were not diagnosed with cardiac involvement at the time of enrollment. A multivariate analysis revealed that hs-cTnT was an independent biomarker for the prediction of cardiac events (hs-cTnT >0.014 ng/mL: HR: 7.31, 95% confidence interval: 2.20 to 24.28, p<0.001). Conclusion Hs-cTnT is a useful biomarker for predicting cardiovascular events in patients with sarcoidosis, even if cardiac involvement is not detected at the initial evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.