Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927952›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A urine-based ELISA with recombinant non-glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies.

Fernanda F Ramos, Flávia F Bagno, Paula F Vassallo, João A Oliveira-da-Silva, Thiago A R Reis, Raquel S Bandeira, Amanda S Machado, Daniela P Lage, Vivian T Martins, Ana P Fernandes and 6 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernanda F RamosPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia E Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil.
Flávia F BagnoCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas (CT Vacinas) / BH-Tec, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Paula F VassalloHospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
João A Oliveira-da-SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia E Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil.
Thiago A R ReisPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia E Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil.
Raquel S BandeiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia E Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil.
Amanda S MachadoPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia E Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil.
Daniela P LagePrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia E Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil.
Vivian T MartinsPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia E Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil.
Ana P FernandesCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas (CT Vacinas) / BH-Tec, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Myron ChristodoulidesNeisseria Research Group, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, England.
Cecilia G RavettiDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Vandack NobrePrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia E Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil.
Flávio G da FonsecaCentro de Tecnologia de Vacinas (CT Vacinas) / BH-Tec, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1416-8694
Eduardo A F CoelhoPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia E Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil.
Fernanda LudolfPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia E Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.130-100, Brazil. feludolf@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3357-9816
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serological assays have been widely used to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, which are generated from previous exposure to the virus or after vaccination. The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid antibodies was recently reported in patients´ urine using an in-house urine-based ELISA-platform, allowing a non-invasive way to collect clinical samples and assess immune conversion. In the current study, we evaluated and validated another in-house urine-based ELISA for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibodies. Three partial recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike proteins comprising the Receptor Binding Domain, expressed in eukaryotic or prokaryotic systems, were tested in an ELISA platform against a panel of over 140 urine and paired serum samples collected from 106 patients confirmed positive for SARS-CoV-2 by qRT-PCR. The key findings from our study were that anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibodies could be detected in urine samples and that the prokaryotic expression of the rSARS-CoV-2 Spike protein was not a barrier to obtain relatively high serology efficiency for the urine-based assay. Thus, use of a urine-based ELISA assay with partial rSARS-CoV-2 Spike proteins, expressed in a prokaryotic system, could be considered as a convenient tool for screening for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibodies, and overcome the difficulties arising from sample collection and the need for recombinant proteins produced with eukaryotic expression systems.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, ViralSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36927952
PMCPMC10018619
OpenAlexW4327599007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read3
measurements read74
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.