Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927887›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Assessment of the effect of spacer material on gap and void formation in an endodontic temporary restoration using micro-computed tomography.

Manal Alkadi, Fahda N Algahtani, Reem Barakat, Rahaf Almohareb, Reem Alsaqat

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manal AlkadiDental Clinics Department, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1943-0065
Fahda N AlgahtaniDivision of Endodontics, Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia. fnalgahtani@pnu.edu.sa.ORCID 0000-0001-7626-1635
Reem BarakatDental Clinics Department, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4952-1400
Rahaf AlmoharebDivision of Endodontics, Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7536-359X
Reem AlsaqatDental Clinics Department, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two spacer materials (cotton pellet and polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE]) on gap and void formation in the Cavit restoration used for endodontic temporization. Thirty-four extracted human single-rooted premolars were matched and allocated into two groups (n = 17/group) according to the access cavity spacer (cotton pellet or PTFE). Standardized endodontic access cavities were prepared in all the teeth. Subsequently, the teeth were scanned by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to determine the volume of the access cavities. The teeth were then temporized by placing either cotton pellet or PTFE as spacer materials on the canal orifices, followed by the Cavit restoration. Following the temporization procedure, the teeth were subjected to a second micro-CT scan to determine the percentage volume of gaps and voids along the margins and within the Cavit restoration, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with a 5% significance level. The PTFE spacer was associated with significantly less gap formation between the Cavit restoration and the access cavity walls (P < 0.05) compared with the cotton pellet. No difference existed in void formation between the groups (P > 0.05). These findings indicate that the spacer material placed under the Cavit restoration can influence the quality of overlying restoration. PTFE was associated with less gap formation and, therefore, performed better than the cotton pellet as a spacer material beneath the Cavit restoration during endodontic treatment.

Indexed as

Dental CementsZinc OxideCalcium SulfateDental Restoration, TemporaryHumansPolytetrafluoroethylenePolyvinylsX-Ray MicrotomographyCalcium SulfateCavitDental CementsPolytetrafluoroethylenePolyvinylsZinc Oxide

Identifiers

PMID36927887
PMCPMC10020472
OpenAlexW4327545619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read7
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.