Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927859›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2023

Food taboo practices and associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Berhanu Gidisa Debela, Daniel Sisay, Habtamu Endashaw Hareru, Helen Ali Ewune, Anene Tesfa, Daniel Alayu Shewaye, Temesgen Muche Ewunie

Full text readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Berhanu Gidisa DebelaSchool of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Science, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia. berhanugdebela@gmail.com.
Daniel SisaySchool of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Science, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Habtamu Endashaw HareruSchool of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Science, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Helen Ali EwuneDepartment of Human Nutrition, College of Health and Medical Science, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Anene TesfaEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Daniel Alayu ShewayeSchool of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Science, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Temesgen Muche EwunieDepartment of Human Nutrition, College of Health and Medical Science, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food taboos have a negative impact on pregnant women and their fetuses by preventing them from consuming vital foods. Previous research found that pregnant women avoided certain foods during their pregnancy for a variety of reasons. This review aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of food taboo practices and associated factors in Ethiopia. In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, we searched the literature using PubMed/MEDLINE, AJOL (African Journal Online), HINARI, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Google electronic databases. The random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of food taboo and its determinants at a 95% confidence interval with their respective odds ratios. The pooled food taboo practice among Ethiopian pregnant women was 34.22% (95% CI 25.47-42.96), and after adjustment for publication bias with the trim-and-fill analysis, the pooled food taboo practice of pregnant women was changed to 21.31% (95% CI: 10.85-31.67%). Having less than a secondary education level (OR = 3.57; 95% CI 1.43-8.89), having no ANC follow-up (OR = 4.35; 95% CI 1.12-16.94), and being a rural resident (OR = 3.08; 95% CI 1.14-8.28) were the significant factors. Dairy products, some fruits, green leafy vegetables, meat, and honey are among the taboo foods. The most frequently stated reasons for this taboo practice were: fear of producing a big fetus, which is difficult during delivery; attachment to the fetus's body or head; and fear of fetal abnormality.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleTabooEthiopiaFemaleHumansMeatPregnancyPrevalenceVegetables

Identifiers

PMID36927859
PMCPMC10020167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read71
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.