Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927850›Full record

ArticleRMD open2023

Dynamic assessment of the double contour sign by ultrasonography helps to distinguish between gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease.

Edoardo Cipolletta, Abhishek Abhishek, Andrea Di Matteo, Walter Grassi, Emilio Filippucci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Palindromic Rheumatism: Revisiting the Approach to an Enigmatic Condition.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Advanced imaging techniques in crystal arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Ultrasound Features in Gout: An Overview.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Edoardo CipollettaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy edoardocipolletta@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6881-8197
Abhishek AbhishekAcademic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Andrea Di MatteoDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0867-7051
Walter GrassiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Emilio FilippucciDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7251-7784
Marche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test whether the double contour (DC) sign has a different dynamic behaviour in gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) and whether the dynamic assessment of the DC sign increases its accuracy in gout diagnosis.

methodsThis cross-sectional analysis included patients with gout meeting the 2015 ACR/EULAR classification criteria and patients with crystal-proven diagnosis of CPPD. Hyaline cartilages were explored by ultrasound (US) to detect the DC sign (ie, abnormal hyperechoic band over the superficial margin of hyaline cartilages) and its dynamic behaviour during joint movement was evaluated ((ie, movement of the DC sign together with subchondral bone (DC sign), or in the opposite direction (pseudo DC sign)).

resultsEighty-one patients with gout and 84 patients with CPPD underwent US assessment. Among them, 47 patients with gout and 9 patients with CPPD had evidence of the DC sign. During dynamic assessment, in all 47/47 patients with gout there was a DC sign. Conversely, in 7/9 (77.8%) patients with CPPD, there was a pseudo DC sign (p<0.01).The presence of DC sign during static assessment had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 58.0% (95% CI 46.5% to 68.9%), 89.3% (95% CI 80.6% to 95.0%) and 73.9% (95% CI 66.5% to 80.5%) for gout, respectively. The dynamic evaluation improved the DC sign's diagnostic performance (p=0.01) as the specificity (97.6% (95% CI 91.7% to 99.7%)) and the accuracy (78.2% (95% CI 71.1% to 84.2%)) increased without loss in sensitivity.

conclusionThe dynamic US assessment of the DC sign may help to differentiate the DC sign due to MSU crystals from the pseudo DC sign seen in CPPD, as they move in opposite directions.

Indexed as

CalcinosisChondrocalcinosisGoutCalcium PyrophosphateCross-Sectional StudiesHumansUltrasonographyCalcium PyrophosphateChondrocalcinosisCrystal arthropathiesGoutUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36927850
PMCPMC10030737
OpenAlexW4327575262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.