Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927830›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Determining the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Availability, Use, and Readiness of Family Planning and Contraceptive Services at Selected Primary Health Care Facilities in Africa and Asia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Rita Kabra, Beena Joshi, Ester Elisaria, Tanimola Makanjuola Akande, Komal Preet Allagh, Adesola Olumide, Deepti Tandon, Ranjan Kumar Prusty, Mary Ramesh, Donat Shamba and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Trends in Utilization of Contraceptive and Pregnancy-Related Services around COVID-19 Pandemic through Public Health Facilities: A Secondary Data Analysis.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Rita KabraUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6595-2035
Beena JoshiDepartment of Biostatistics, National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-4922
Ester ElisariaDepartment of Impact Evaluation, Health System and Policy Analysis, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7106-2423
Tanimola Makanjuola AkandeDepartment of Epidemiology and Community Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ilorin and University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5220-8669
Komal Preet AllaghDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-2135
Adesola OlumideInstitute of Child Health, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4372-9822
Deepti TandonDepartment of Biostatistics, National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7889-7346
Ranjan Kumar PrustyDepartment of Biostatistics, National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7972-6725
Mary RameshDepartment of Impact Evaluation, Health System and Policy Analysis, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4942-3923
Donat ShambaDepartment of Impact Evaluation, Health System and Policy Analysis, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7431-7199
James KiarieUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4180-7858
Ifakara Health Institute · TZNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health · INWorld Health Organization · CHUniversity of Ibadan · NGUniversity of Ilorin Teaching Hospital · NG

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic and the associated social restrictions may have disrupted the provision of essential services, including family planning (FP) and contraceptive services. This protocol is adapted from a generic study protocol titled "Health systems analysis and evaluations of the barriers to availability and readiness of sexual and reproductive health services in COVID-19 affected areas," conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) Department of Reproductive Health and Research.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the availability and use of FP and contraceptive services in primary health facilities during and after the COVID-19 pandemic; assess the risk perceptions of COVID-19 stigma, barriers to access, and quality of services from clients' and providers' perspectives in the COVID-19-affected areas; and assess the postpandemic recovery of the facilities in the provision of FP and contraceptive services.

methodsIn-depth interviews will be conducted with clients-women in the reproductive age group and their male partners who visit the selected health facilities for FP and contraceptive services-and health providers (the most knowledgeable person on FP and contraceptive service provision) at the selected health facilities. Focus group discussions will be conducted with clients at the selected health facilities and in the community. The in-depth interviews and focus group discussions will help to understand clients' and health service providers' perspectives of FP and contraceptive service availability and readiness in COVID-19-affected areas. A cross-sectional health facility assessment will be conducted in all the selected health facilities to determine the health facility infrastructure's ability and readiness to provide FP and contraceptive services and to capture the trends in FP and contraceptive services available during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific approval for this study is obtained from the WHO Research Project Review Panel, and the WHO Ethics Review Committee has given ethical approval in the 3 countries.

resultsUsing a standardized research protocol will ensure that the results from this study can be compared across regions and countries. The study was funded in March 2021. It received ethics approval from the WHO Ethics Review Committee in February 2022. We completed data collection in September 2022. We plan to complete the data analysis by March 2023. We plan to publish the study results by Summer 2023.

conclusionsThe findings from this study will provide a better understanding of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on FP and contraceptive services at the facility level, which will help policy makers and health managers develop and strengthen FP policies and services in health facilities to be more responsive to community needs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/43329.

Indexed as

contraceptionCOVID-19facility assessmentfamily planningstock-out

Identifiers

PMID36927830
PMCPMC10173704
OpenAlexW4320063514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.