Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927826›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Rapid learning of predictive maps with STDP and theta phase precession.

Tom M George, William de Cothi, Kimberly L Stachenfeld, Caswell Barry

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The hippocampus as a small-world cognitive map.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Theta-nested gamma oscillations balance prediction and vigilance in spatial navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tom M George *Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4527-8810
William de Cothi *Research Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5624-9196
Kimberly L StachenfeldDeepMind, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6936-4257
Caswell BarryResearch Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6718-0649
University College London · GBGoogle DeepMind (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212281/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The predictive map hypothesis is a promising candidate principle for hippocampal function. A favoured formalisation of this hypothesis, called the successor representation, proposes that each place cell encodes the expected state occupancy of its target location in the near future. This predictive framework is supported by behavioural as well as electrophysiological evidence and has desirable consequences for both the generalisability and efficiency of reinforcement learning algorithms. However, it is unclear how the successor representation might be learnt in the brain. Error-driven temporal difference learning, commonly used to learn successor representations in artificial agents, is not known to be implemented in hippocampal networks. Instead, we demonstrate that spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP), a form of Hebbian learning, acting on temporally compressed trajectories known as 'theta sweeps', is sufficient to rapidly learn a close approximation to the successor representation. The model is biologically plausible - it uses spiking neurons modulated by theta-band oscillations, diffuse and overlapping place cell-like state representations, and experimentally matched parameters. We show how this model maps onto known aspects of hippocampal circuitry and explains substantial variance in the temporal difference successor matrix, consequently giving rise to place cells that demonstrate experimentally observed successor representation-related phenomena including backwards expansion on a 1D track and elongation near walls in 2D. Finally, our model provides insight into the observed topographical ordering of place field sizes along the dorsal-ventral axis by showing this is necessary to prevent the detrimental mixing of larger place fields, which encode longer timescale successor representations, with more fine-grained predictions of spatial location.

Indexed as

HippocampusNeuronsAction PotentialsAlgorithmsBehavior TherapyModels, NeurologicalReinforcement, PsychologyTheta Rhythmhippocampusneurosciencenonephase precessionplace cellsSTDPsuccessor representationstheta

Identifiers

PMID36927826
PMCPMC10019887
OpenAlexW4327587510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read26
table measurements read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.