Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927774›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2023

Booster vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S or an Omicron-adapted vaccine in pre-immune hamsters protects against Omicron BA.2.

Maarten Swart, Joan van der Lubbe, Sonja Schmit-Tillemans, Ella van Huizen, Johan Verspuij, Ana Izquierdo Gil, Ying Choi, Chenandly Daal, Aditya Perkasa, Adriaan de Wilde and 23 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maarten SwartJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-0773
Joan van der LubbeJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sonja Schmit-TillemansJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ella van HuizenJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johan VerspuijJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ana Izquierdo GilJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-1807
Ying ChoiJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Chenandly DaalJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Aditya PerkasaJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Adriaan de WildeJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Erwin ClaassenWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Rineke de JongWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2052-5993
Katrin E WieseWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Lisette CornelissenWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Marieke van EsWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Marjolein van HeerdenJanssen Research and Development, Preclinical Sciences and Translational Safety, Beerse, Belgium.
Eleni KourkoutaJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Issam TahiriJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michel MuldersJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jessica VreugdenhilJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karin Feddes-de BoerJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leacky MucheneJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jeroen TolboomJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth DekkingDekking Consultancy, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jarek JuraszekJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jort VellingaJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jerome CustersJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rinke BosJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hanneke SchuitemakerJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8563-2266
Frank WegmannJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9821-1492
Ramon RoozendaalJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4084-4801
Harmjan KuipersJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1317-394X
Roland ZahnJanssen Vaccines & Prevention, Leiden, The Netherlands. rzahn@its.jnj.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2822-6231
Janssen (Netherlands) · NLWageningen University & Research · NLJanssen (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the original outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, several rapidly spreading SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) have emerged. Here, we show that a single dose of Ad26.COV2.S (based on the Wuhan-Hu-1 spike variant) protects against the Gamma and Delta variants in naive hamsters, supporting the observed maintained vaccine efficacy in humans against these VOC. Adapted spike-based booster vaccines targeting Omicron variants have now been authorized in the absence of human efficacy data. We evaluated the immunogenicity and efficacy of Ad26.COV2.S.529 (encoding a stabilized Omicron BA.1 spike) in naive mice and in hamsters with pre-existing immunity to the Wuhan-Hu-1 spike. In naive mice, Ad26.COV2.S.529 elicited higher neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2, compared with Ad26.COV2.S. However, neutralizing titers against the SARS-CoV-2 B.1 (D614G) and Delta variants were lower after primary vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S.529 compared with Ad26.COV2.S. In contrast, we found comparable Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 neutralizing titers in hamsters with pre-existing Wuhan-Hu-1 spike immunity after vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S, Ad26.COV2.S.529 or a combination of the two vaccines. Moreover, all three vaccine modalities induced equivalent protection against Omicron BA.2 challenge in these animals. Overall, our data suggest that an Omicron BA.1-based booster in rodents does not improve immunogenicity and efficacy against Omicron BA.2 over an Ad26.COV2.S booster in a setting of pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

Identifiers

PMID36927774
PMCPMC10018069
OpenAlexW4327677622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read55
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.