Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927760›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023

Phenotyping Superagers Using Resting-State fMRI.

L L de Godoy, A Studart-Neto, D R de Paula, N Green, A Halder, P Arantes, K T Chaim, N C Moraes, M S Yassuda, R Nitrini and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

L L de GodoyFrom the Departments of Radiology and Oncology (L.L.d.G., P.A., K.T.C., C.d.C.L.) laiz.godoy@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5956-5741
A Studart-NetoNeurology (A.S.-N., N.C.M., M.S.Y., R.N.), Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2260-5986
D R de PaulaDonders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behavior (D.R.d.P., M.D.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0590-8694
N GreenDepartment of Statistics (N.G.), University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2745-1736
A HalderDepartments of Medical Biophysics (A.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-3195-9623
P ArantesFrom the Departments of Radiology and Oncology (L.L.d.G., P.A., K.T.C., C.d.C.L.).ORCID 0000-0001-6974-644X
K T ChaimFrom the Departments of Radiology and Oncology (L.L.d.G., P.A., K.T.C., C.d.C.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-5803-0099
N C MoraesNeurology (A.S.-N., N.C.M., M.S.Y., R.N.), Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8439-6828
M S YassudaNeurology (A.S.-N., N.C.M., M.S.Y., R.N.), Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9182-2450
R NitriniNeurology (A.S.-N., N.C.M., M.S.Y., R.N.), Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5721-1525
M DreslerDonders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behavior (D.R.d.P., M.D.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7441-3818
C da Costa LeiteFrom the Departments of Radiology and Oncology (L.L.d.G., P.A., K.T.C., C.d.C.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-1168-0780
J Panovska-GriffithsThe Big Data Institute and the Pandemic Sciences Institute (J.P.-G.).ORCID 0000-0002-7720-1121
A SodduPhysics and Astronomy (A.S.), University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6833-745X
S BisdasLysholm Department of Neuroradiology (L.L.d.G., S.B.), The National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery.ORCID 0000-0001-9930-5549
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRL-3 Communications (United States) · USNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLInstitute of Biophysics · BGUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSuperagers are defined as older adults with episodic memory performance similar or superior to that in middle-aged adults. This study aimed to investigate the key differences in discriminative networks and their main nodes between superagers and cognitively average elderly controls. In addition, we sought to explore differences in sensitivity in detecting these functional activities across the networks at 3T and 7T MR imaging fields. MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty-five subjects 80 years of age or older were screened using a detailed neuropsychological protocol, and 31 participants, comprising 14 superagers and 17 cognitively average elderly controls, were included for analysis. Participants underwent resting-state-fMRI at 3T and 7T MR imaging. A prediction classification algorithm using a penalized regression model on the measurements of the network was used to calculate the probabilities of a healthy older adult being a superager. Additionally, ORs quantified the influence of each node across preselected networks.

resultsThe key networks that differentiated superagers and elderly controls were the default mode, salience, and language networks. The most discriminative nodes (ORs > 1) in superagers encompassed areas in the precuneus posterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, temporal pole, extrastriate superior cortex, and insula. The prediction classification model for being a superager showed better performance using the 7T compared with 3T resting-state-fMRI data set.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the functional connectivity in the default mode, salience, and language networks can provide potential imaging biomarkers for predicting superagers. The 7T field holds promise for the most appropriate study setting to accurately detect the functional connectivity patterns in superagers.

Indexed as

Gyrus CinguliMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedBrainBrain MappingCognitionHumansMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexTemporal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID36927760
PMCPMC10084893
OpenAlexW4327565183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.