Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927759›Full record

Trial reportAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023

Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

W Boisseau, T E Darsaut, R Fahed, B Drake, H Lesiuk, J L Rempel, J-C Gentric, J Ognard, L Nico, D Iancu and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Balloon inflation predicts recanalization of intracranial aneurysms treated with coiling alone.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

W BoisseauFrom the Department of Radiology (W.B., D.I., D.R., A.W., J.R.), Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8120-5128
T E DarsautDepartment of Surgery (T.E.D.), Division of Neurosurgery.ORCID 0000-0003-4662-1550
R FahedDepartments of Neurology (R.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-1887-5097
B DrakeNeurosurgery (B.D., H.L.), University of Ottawa, the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0583-7366
H LesiukNeurosurgery (B.D., H.L.), University of Ottawa, the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5683-1899
J L RempelDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.R.), University of Alberta Hospital, Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2324-8415
J-C GentricDepartment of Radiology (J.-C.G., J.O.), University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1655-1371
J OgnardDepartment of Radiology (J.-C.G., J.O.), University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4495-7464
L NicoDepartement of Radiology (L.N.), Service of Interventional Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalo-universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2680-8916
D IancuFrom the Department of Radiology (W.B., D.I., D.R., A.W., J.R.), Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2041-9178
D RoyFrom the Department of Radiology (W.B., D.I., D.R., A.W., J.R.), Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6066-4453
A WeillFrom the Department of Radiology (W.B., D.I., D.R., A.W., J.R.), Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0281-6201
M ChagnonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics (M.C., J.Z.), Pavillon André-Aisenstadt, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2291-9566
J ZehrDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics (M.C., J.Z.), Pavillon André-Aisenstadt, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8295-4590
P LavoieDepartment of Neurosurgery (P.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5619-5914
T N NguyenDepartments of Neurology (T.N.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-2810-1685
J RaymondFrom the Department of Radiology (W.B., D.I., D.R., A.W., J.R.), Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada jean.raymond@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-4274
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CACentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRMcGill University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CABoston Medical Center · USCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRFaculty of 1000 (United Kingdom) · GBHealth Sciences Centre · CAHesco (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeStent-assisted coiling may improve angiographic results of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms compared with coiling alone, but this has never been shown in a randomized trial. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Stenting in the Treatment of Aneurysm Trial was an investigator-led, parallel, randomized (1:1) trial conducted in 4 university hospitals. Patients with intracranial aneurysms at risk of recurrence, defined as large aneurysms (≥10 mm), postcoiling recurrent aneurysms, or small aneurysms with a wide neck (≥4 mm), were randomly allocated to stent-assisted coiling or coiling alone. The composite primary efficacy outcome was "treatment failure," defined as initial failure to treat the aneurysm; aneurysm rupture or retreatment during follow-up; death or dependency (mRS > 2); or an angiographic residual aneurysm adjudicated by an independent core laboratory at 12 months. The primary hypothesis (revised for slow accrual) was that stent-assisted coiling would decrease treatment failures from 33% to 15%, requiring 200 patients. Primary analyses were intent to treat.

resultsOf 205 patients recruited between 2011 and 2021, ninety-four were allocated to stent-assisted coiling and 111 to coiling alone. The primary outcome, ascertainable in 203 patients, was reached in 28/93 patients allocated to stent-assisted coiling (30.1%; 95% CI, 21.2%-40.6%) compared with 30/110 (27.3%; 95% CI, 19.4%-36.7%) allocated to coiling alone (relative risk = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.7-1.7;

conclusionsThe STAT trial did not show stent-assisted coiling to be superior to coiling alone for wide-neck, large, or recurrent unruptured aneurysms.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmStentsAgedFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36927759
PMCPMC10084896
OpenAlexW4327573086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.