Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927723›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2023

Detection of tick-borne encephalitis virus in ear tissue and dried blood spots from naturally infected wild rodents.

Emily L Pascoe, Ankje de Vries, Helen J Esser, Constantianus J M Koenraadt, Hein Sprong

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multiple variants of tick-borne encephalitis virus in voles, mice and ticks, the Netherlands, 2021 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily L PascoeLaboratory of Entomology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. emilylpascoe@gmail.com.
Ankje de VriesLaboratory for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology, National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Antonie Van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Helen J EsserWildlife Ecology & Conservation Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Constantianus J M KoenraadtLaboratory of Entomology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hein SprongLaboratory for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology, National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Antonie Van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLWageningen University & Research · NLGraduate School Experimental Plant Sciences · NL

Funding

Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Unrestricted research grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) can cause severe neurological disease in humans. Its geographical distribution is expanding in Western Europe with unresolved causes and spatial patterns, necessitating enhanced surveillance. Monitoring the virus in the environment is complicated, as it usually relies on destructive sampling of small rodents to test organs for TBEV, which in addition to ethical considerations also raises issues for long-term monitoring or longitudinal studies. Moreover, even when the virus is not detected in the blood or organs of the rodent, TBEV can still be transmitted from an infected tick to uninfected ticks feeding nearby. This is due to the ability of TBEV to replicate and migrate locally within the epidermis of small mammals, including those that do not appear to have systemic infection. This suggests that the virus may be detectable in skin biopsies, which has been confirmed in experimentally infected laboratory rodents, but it remains unknown if this sample type may be a viable alternative to destructively obtained samples in the monitoring of natural TBEV infection. Here we test ear tissue and dried blood spot (DBS) samples from rodents to determine whether TBEV-RNA can be detected in biological samples obtained non-destructively.

methodsRodents were live-trapped and sampled at three woodland areas in The Netherlands where presence of TBEV has previously been recorded. Ear tissue (n = 79) and DBSs (n = 112) were collected from a total of 117 individuals and were tested for TBEV-RNA by real-time RT-PCR.

resultsTBEV-RNA was detected in five rodents (4.3% of tested individuals), all of which had a TBEV-positive ear sample, while only two out of four of these individuals (for which a DBS was available) had a positive DBS. This equated to 6.3% of ear samples and 1.8% of DBSs testing positive for TBEV-RNA.

conclusionsWe provide the first evidence to our knowledge that TBEV-RNA can be detected in samples obtained non-destructively from naturally infected wild rodents, providing a viable sampling alternative suitable for longitudinal surveillance of the virus.

Indexed as

Encephalitis, Tick-BorneEncephalitis Viruses, Tick-BorneTicksAnimalsHumansMammalsRNARodentiaRNAReservoir hostSamplingSurveillanceTick-borne encephalitis virus

Identifiers

PMID36927723
PMCPMC10018976
OpenAlexW4327590947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read28
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.