ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2023
The evolution of acute lymphoblastic leukemia research and therapy at MD Anderson over four decades.
Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing therapeutic effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and chemotherapy in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and long-term survival of CD19/22 versus CD19 CAR-T immunotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL with TP53 alterations.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Trial
- Impact of clinical response and treatment tolerability on HRQoL in newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with ponatinib or imatinib.Annals of hematology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Second primary cancers following hematologic malignancies: Epidemiology, pathobiology and clinical management.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Next-generation antibody-based therapeutics in cancer: antibody-drug conjugates bispecific antibodies across hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Myeloid cell-mediated killing of B-ALL by CD38 and CD20 IgA antibody variants is enhanced by CD47/SIRPα interference.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: incorporation of recent advances into current treatment strategies.Blood cancer journal · 2026Review
- Frontline ponatinib plus hyper-CVAD over imatinib in adults with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: realworld efficacy and risks of early ponatinib dose reduction.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Transcriptomics-based multi-omics approach for optimizing risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- How to Change the Role of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Immunotherapy in the up-front treatment of adult B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: when, how, who?Blood advances · 2026Review
- Proteomics landscape of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia reveals deficient oxidative phosphorylation signatures.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Potential of extracellular vesicle-derived microRNAs as a platform for biomarker discovery in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Challenges and opportunities for improvement in the practical management of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Comprehensive omics-based classification system in adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- FDA Approval Summary: Blinatumomab for the Treatment of B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Consolidation Phase of Multiphase Chemotherapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Progress in the research and therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is accelerating. This analysis summarizes the data derived from the clinical trials conducted at MD Anderson between 1985 and 2022 across ALL subtypes. In Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL, the addition of BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to intensive chemotherapy since 2000, improved outcomes. More recently, a chemotherapy-free regimen with blinatumomab and ponatinib resulted in a complete molecular remission rate of 85% and an estimated 3-year survival rate of 90%, potentially reducing the role of, and need for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in remission. In younger patients with pre-B Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL, the integration of blinatumomab and inotuzumab into the frontline therapy has improved the estimated 3-year survival rate to 85% across all risk categories. Our future strategy is to evaluate the early integration of both immunotherapy agents, inotuzumab and blinatumomab, with low-dose chemotherapy (dose-dense mini-Hyper-CVD-inotuzumab-blinatumomab) into the frontline setting followed by CAR T cells consolidation in high-risk patients, without any further maintenance therapy. In older patients, using less intensive chemotherapy (mini-Hyper-CVD) in combination with inotuzumab and blinatumomab has improved the 5-year survival rate to 50%. Among patients ≥ 65-70 years, the mortality in complete remission (CR) is still high and is multifactorial (old age, death in CR with infections, development of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia). A chemotherapy-free regimen with inotuzumab and blinatumomab is being investigated. The assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is superior to conventional assays, with early MRD negativity by NGS being associated with the best survival. We anticipate that the future therapy in B-ALL will involve less intensive and shorter chemotherapy regimens in combination with agents targeting CD19 (blinatumomab), CD20, and CD22 (inotuzumab). The optimal timing and use of CAR T cells therapy may be in the setting of minimal disease, and future trials will assess the role of CAR T cells as a consolidation among high-risk patients to replace allogeneic SCT. In summary, the management of ALL has witnessed significant progress during the past four decades. Novel combination regimens including newer-generation BCR::ABL1 TKIs and novel antibodies are questioning the need and duration of intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic SCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.