Trial reportBMJ open2023
Development of a tool for objectively measuring somatic pain in the low back region based on a longitudinal diagnostic study conducted in Karachi, Pakistan.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04482075 (Cross-modality Matching Between Pressure Pain Threshold and Subjective Ratings of Pain Intensity, Affect and Disability in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cross-modality Matching Between Pressure Pain Threshold and Subjective Ratings of Pain Intensity, Affect and Disability in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed at devising an objective method for quantifying pain in the low back region using pressure pain threshold (PPT) and demographic factors as predictive variables.
methodsThe research was conducted in two phases. Phase I was a longitudinal exploratory study conducted on 49 men aged 18-50 years with chronic low back pain (CLBP) recruited using non-probability purposive sampling. We used Visual Analogue Scale to record pain intensity and pain affect, and Disability Rating Index to record associated disability. PPT was measured on 12 different locations on the lower back using a manual algometer. These measurements were taken from each participant in 1 to 6-follow-up visits, depending on improvement in the individual's symptoms. In phase II additional 33 subjects, both men and women with varying durations of low back pain were recruited using non-probability convenience sampling. Repeated measures ordinal regression and receiver's operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to develop predictive models using STATA V.16.0 and R V.3.5.2 software. These models were given an interface using Microsoft Excel. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsHigher PPT scores, increased lean body mass, lean physique and a longer duration of CLBP were associated with a reduction in CLBP intensity, affect and disability. Advancing age was associated with an increase in these outcomes. Collectively, these factors were found to predict pain intensity, affect, and disability with 63%-65% diagnostic accuracy in phase I, however, this diagnostic accuracy increased to 65%-78% in phase II.
conclusionWe developed a new outcome tool 'Pain Calculator' that can objectively measure low back pain with sufficient statistical accuracy. With further refinement, this tool in the future can be configured to measure somatic pain in different regions as well, affording clinicians and researchers much-needed objectivity while recording pain levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04482075.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.