Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927592›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Common health assets protocol: a mixed-methods, realist evaluation and economic appraisal of how community-led organisations (CLOs) impact on the health and well-being of people living in deprived areas.

Rachel Mairi Baker, Mohasin Ahmed, Marcello Bertotti, John Cassidy, Rejoice Chipuriro, Emma Clewett, Cam Donaldson, Andrew Elders, Lee Ann Fenge, Julie Fox and 17 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CICing the partnership model into the future: a new social enterprise model for general practice?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Rachel Mairi BakerYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK rachel.baker@gcu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3451-2018
Mohasin AhmedGlasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, UK.
Marcello BertottiInstitute for Connected Communities, University of East London, London, UK.
John CassidyScottish Communities for Health and Wellbeing, Glasgow, UK.
Rejoice ChipuriroDepartment of Social Sciences and Social Work, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-4966
Emma ClewettInstitute for Connected Communities, University of East London, London, UK.
Cam DonaldsonYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4670-5340
Andrew EldersNMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4172-4702
Lee Ann FengeDepartment of Social Sciences and Social Work, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
Julie FoxAnnexe Communities Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Karen GalwaySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4216-6135
Aideen GildeaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0685-0132
Aileen McGuinnessBogside and Brandywell Health Forum, Derry, UK.
Jennifer McLeanGlasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, UK.
Sarkis ManoukianYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5057-8236
Helen MasonYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9303-2794
Antony MorganYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Jill MulhollandSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0112-4083
Liam O'HareInnovation Zones, School of Social Science, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4453-2880
Andrew PatersonScottish Community Development Centre, Glasgow, UK.
Sam PorterDepartment of Social Sciences and Social Work, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
Jack RendallYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Michael J RoyYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1834-0826
Peter SeamanGlasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, UK.
Merron SimpsonThe Health Creation Alliance, UK.
Artur SteinerYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7422-8396
Michael P KellyPublic Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2029-5841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis research investigates how community-led organisations' (CLOs') use of assets-based approaches improves health and well-being, and how that might be different in different contexts. Assets-based approaches involve 'doing with' rather than 'doing to' and bring people in communities together to achieve positive change using their own knowledge, skills and experience. Some studies have shown that such approaches can have a positive effect on health and well-being. However, research is limited, and we know little about which approaches lead to which outcomes and how different contexts might affect success. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using a realist approach, we will work with 15 CLOs based in disadvantaged communities in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. A realist synthesis of review papers, and a policy analysis in different contexts, precedes qualitative interviews and workshops with stakeholders, to find out how CLOs' programmes work and identify existing data. We will explore participants' experiences through: a Q methodology study; participatory photography workshops; qualitative interviews and measure outcomes using a longitudinal survey, with 225 CLO participants, to assess impact for people who connect with the CLOs. An economic analysis will estimate costs and benefits to participants, for different contexts and mechanisms. A 'Lived Experience Panel' of people connected with our CLOs as participants or volunteers, will ensure the appropriateness of the research, interpretation and reporting of findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project, research tools and consent processes have been approved by the Glasgow Caledonian University School of Health and Life Sciences Ethics Committee, and affirmed by Ethics Committees at Bournemouth University, Queen's University Belfast and the University of East London. Common Health Assets does not involve any National Health Service sites, staff or patients.Findings will be presented through social media, project website, blogs, policy briefings, journal articles, conferences and visually in short digital stories, and photographic exhibitions.

Indexed as

Research DesignState MedicineCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandHumansScotlandHEALTH ECONOMICSPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID36927592
PMCPMC10030928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.