Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927571›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain.

Dinavahi V P S Murty, Songtao Song, Srinivas Govinda Surampudi, Luiz Pessoa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fear, anxiety, and the extended amygdala-bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Shared Threat-Anticipation Circuit Is Dynamically Engaged at Different Moments by Certain and Uncertain Threat.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Persistent Threat Avoidance Following Negative Reinforcement Is Not Associated with Elevated State Anxiety.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. How Distributed Subcortical Integration of Reward and Threat May Inform Subsequent Approach-Avoidance Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dinavahi V P S MurtyDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742.ORCID 0000-0003-1726-5171
Songtao SongDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742.
Srinivas Govinda SurampudiDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742.
Luiz PessoaDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 pessoa@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4696-6903

Funding

INTERACTION OF EMOTIONAL PERCEPTION AND VISUAL ATTENTIONR01MH071589 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI PESSOA, LUIZ · 2004 to 2024
$8.9M
Dynamics of Large-Scale Networks During Emotional and Social ProcessingR01MH112517 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI PESSOA, LUIZ, REDCAY, ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. In addition, the extent to which aversive-related and appetitive-related processing engage distinct or overlapping circuits remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive and appetitive processing while male and female participants engaged in comparable trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. For example, in the aversive domain, we predicted that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), but not the amygdala, would exhibit anticipatory responses given the role of the former in anxious apprehension. We also predicted that the periaqueductal gray (PAG) would exhibit threat-proximity responses based on its involvement in proximal-threat processes, and that the ventral striatum would exhibit threat-imminence responses given its role in threat escape in rodents. Overall, we uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the BST, PAG, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Whereas the ventral striatum generated anticipatory responses in the proximity of reward as expected, it also exhibited threat-related imminence responses. In fact, across multiple brain regions, we observed a main effect of arousal. In other words, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence, findings further supported by network analysis.

Indexed as

BrainRewardAmygdalaBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePeriaqueductal Grayanxietyrewardthreat

Identifiers

PMID36927571
PMCPMC10124955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.