Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927511›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Highly accurate long reads are crucial for realizing the potential of biodiversity genomics.

Scott Hotaling, Edward R Wilcox, Jacqueline Heckenhauer, Russell J Stewart, Paul B Frandsen

Open access · goldFull text readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structural Variation and Its Roles in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott HotalingDepartment of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA. scott.hotaling1@gmail.com.
Edward R WilcoxDNA Sequencing Center, Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Jacqueline HeckenhauerLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Frankfurt, Germany.
Russell J StewartDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Paul B FrandsenLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Frankfurt, Germany. paul_frandsen@byu.edu.
Brigham Young University · USSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M · DEUniversity of Utah · USUtah State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenerating the most contiguous, accurate genome assemblies given available sequencing technologies is a long-standing challenge in genome science. With the rise of long-read sequencing, assembly challenges have shifted from merely increasing contiguity to correctly assembling complex, repetitive regions of interest, ideally in a phased manner. At present, researchers largely choose between two types of long read data: longer, but less accurate sequences, or highly accurate, but shorter reads (i.e., >Q20 or 99% accurate). To better understand how these types of long-read data as well as scale of data (i.e., mean length and sequencing depth) influence genome assembly outcomes, we compared genome assemblies for a caddisfly, Hesperophylax magnus, generated with longer, but less accurate, Oxford Nanopore (ONT) R9.4.1 and highly accurate PacBio HiFi (HiFi) data. Next, we expanded this comparison to consider the influence of highly accurate long-read sequence data on genome assemblies across 6750 plant and animal genomes. For this broader comparison, we used HiFi data as a surrogate for highly accurate long-reads broadly as we could identify when they were used from GenBank metadata.

resultsHiFi reads outperformed ONT reads in all assembly metrics tested for the caddisfly data set and allowed for accurate assembly of the repetitive ~ 20 Kb H-fibroin gene. Across plants and animals, genome assemblies that incorporated HiFi reads were also more contiguous. For plants, the average HiFi assembly was 501% more contiguous (mean contig N50 = 20.5 Mb) than those generated with any other long-read data (mean contig N50 = 4.1 Mb). For animals, HiFi assemblies were 226% more contiguous (mean contig N50 = 20.9 Mb) versus other long-read assemblies (mean contig N50 = 9.3 Mb). In plants, we also found limited evidence that HiFi may offer a unique solution for overcoming genomic complexity that scales with assembly size.

conclusionsHighly accurate long-reads generated with HiFi or analogous technologies represent a key tool for maximizing genome assembly quality for a wide swath of plants and animals. This finding is particularly important when resources only allow for one type of sequencing data to be generated. Ultimately, to realize the promise of biodiversity genomics, we call for greater uptake of highly accurate long-reads in future studies.

Indexed as

BiodiversityGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsContig MappingDatabases, Nucleic AcidDatasets as TopicFibroinsGenome, InsectGenome, PlantInsectaMeta-Analysis as TopicPlantsReproducibility of ResultsFibroinsCaddisflyGenome biologyHiFiInsectaOxford NanoporePacBio

Identifiers

PMID36927511
PMCPMC10018877
OpenAlexW4327677629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read21
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.