Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927464›Full record

ReviewArthroplasty (London, England)2023

Comparison between gaits after a medial pivot and posterior stabilized primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.

Salvatore Risitano, Giorgio Cacciola, Marcello Capella, Francesco Bosco, Fortunato Giustra, Federico Fusini, Pier Francesco Indelli, Alessandro Massé, Luigi Sabatini

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Step-by-step insight into gait analysis: A narrative review unlocking knee biomechanics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Salvatore RisitanoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy. srisitano@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-1531
Giorgio CacciolaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Marcello CapellaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Francesco BoscoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Fortunato GiustraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Federico FusiniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, 12084, MondovìCuneo, Italy.
Pier Francesco IndelliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Bioengineering, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System (PAVAHCS), Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Alessandro MasséDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Luigi SabatiniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most performed orthopedic procedures worldwide. While excellent efficacy has been reported, about 20% of patients are not satisfied with the result. A potential cause is the problematic reproduction of knee kinematics. This systematic review examines gait analysis studies in primary medial pivot (MP) and posterior stabilized (PS) TKAs to investigate the differences between the two prosthesis designs.

methodsA systematic review was conducted by following PRISMA guidelines. Five databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were analyzed, and eligible articles were evaluated in terms of the levels of evidence. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed by using the MINORS scoring. This review was registered in PROSPERO.

resultsNine studies were included. Gait analysis was performed in 197 MP TKA and 192 PS TKA patients. PS TKA cases showed (P < 0.05) a significantly higher peak of knee flexion angle during the swing phase, greater knee flexion angle at toe-off, an increased knee adduction angle, higher knee flexion and extension moment, increased anterior femoral roll during knee flexion and anterior translation on medial and lateral condyle during knee flexion compared to MP TKA. MP TKA showed statistically significant (P < 0.05) higher knee rotational moment and greater tibiofemoral external rotation motion during knee flexion than PS TKA. No statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) was reported regarding gait spatial-temporal parameters. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Comparison in terms of Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score (mean stiffness) showed that MP TKA yielded significantly better results than PS TKA.

conclusionsThis systematic review revealed significant kinematic and kinetic differences between MP and PS TKA at all gait analysis phases. Furthermore, the considerable difference between TKA design and the kinematics of healthy knee were highlighted in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Gait analysisKinematicsMedial pivotPosterior stabilisedTotal knee replacementWalking

Identifiers

PMID36927464
PMCPMC10022170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.