Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927419›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2023

Low-dose versus standard-dose computed tomography-guided biopsy for pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial.

Er-Liang Li, Ai-Li Ma, Tao Wang, Yu-Fei Fu, Han-Yang Liu, Guang-Chao Li

Registry-linked trialFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04217655 (Low-dose Computed Tomography-guided Core Needle Biopsy for Lung Nodules), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04217655 nacompletednot on this map

Low-dose Computed Tomography-guided Core Needle Biopsy for Lung Nodules

TypeinterventionalSponsorXuzhou Central HospitalRan2020 to 2021Enrolled200ConditionsLung Cancer, Lung, NodeArmsLow-dose computed tomography, Standard-dose computed tomography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization of pulmonary nodules: comparison between tailed coil and suture anchor localization.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparison of computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules performed with and without the coaxial technique.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Systematic review and meta-analysis of low-dose CT-driven biopsy for pulmonary nodules.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  17. Computed tomography-guided biopsy for sub-centimetre pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Er-Liang Li *Department of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Ai-Li Ma *Department of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Tao WangDepartment of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Yu-Fei FuDepartment of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Han-Yang LiuDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China. liuhanyang850322@163.com.
Guang-Chao LiDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. ligch06@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess relative safety and diagnostic performance of low- and standard-dose computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy for pulmonary nodules (PNs). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT). From June 2020 to December 2020, consecutive patients with PNs were randomly assigned into low- or standard-dose groups. The primary outcome was diagnosis accuracy. The secondary outcomes included technical success, diagnostic yield, operation time, radiation dose, and biopsy-related complications. This RCT was registered on 3 January 2020 and listed within ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04217655).

resultsTwo hundred patients were randomly assigned to low-dose (n = 100) and standard-dose (n = 100) groups. All patients achieved the technical success of CT-guided biopsy and definite final diagnoses. No significant difference was found in operation time (n = 0.231) between the two groups. The mean dose-length product was markedly reduced within the low-dose group compared to the standard-dose group (31.5 vs. 333.5 mGy-cm, P < 0.001). The diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the low-dose group were 68%, 91.5%, 100%, and 94%, respectively. The diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 65%, 88.6%, 100%, and 92% in the standard-dose group. There was no significant difference observed in diagnostic yield (P = 0.653), diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.579), rates of pneumothorax (P = 0.836), and lung hemorrhage (P = 0.744) between the two groups.

conclusionsCompared with standard-dose CT-guided biopsy for PNs, low-dose CT can significantly reduce the radiation dose, while yielding comparable safety and diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLungRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiopsyComputed tomographyLow-doseLung nodule

Identifiers

PMID36927419
PMCPMC10018993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read62
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.