Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927413›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Effective dose of remimazolam co-administered with remifentanil to facilitate I-gel insertion without neuromuscular blocking agents: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial.

Juyeon Oh, Sung Yong Park, Ga Yun Lee, Ji Hyun Park, Han Bum Joe

Open access · goldFull text readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Effective bolus dose of remimazolam for i-gelCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Interactions of Remimazolam.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juyeon OhDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-Ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.
Sung Yong ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-Ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.
Ga Yun LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-Ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hyun ParkOffice of Biostatics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Ajou Research Institute for Innovative Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Han Bum JoeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-Ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea. joehanbum@naver.com.
Ajou University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemimazolam is a new anesthetic drug developed and is an ultra-short-acting agent with rapid onset and offset. The pharmacology of this drug seems to be ideal for short surgeries eligible for I-gel insertion. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the optimal bolus dose of remimazolam for I-gel insertion when co-administered with remifentanil without neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs).

methodsPatients aged 19-65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II scheduled for general anesthesia were enrolled. The first dose of remimazolam was 0.15 mg/kg and remifentanil was co-administered at an effect-site concentration (Ce) of 3.0 ng/mL. The dose of remimazolam for the following patient was decreased or increased by 0.05 mg/kg depending on the success or failure of I-gel insertion in the previous patient.

resultsThe remimazolam bolus dose required for successful I-gel insertion in 50% of adult patients using modified Dixon's up-and-down method with remifentanil Ce 3.0 ng/mL and no NMBAs was 0.280 ± 0.048 mg/kg. Isotonic regression analysis showed that the 50% and 95% effective doses were 0.244 (83% confidence interval [CI] 0.213-0.313) mg/kg and 0.444 (95% CI 0.436-0.448) mg/kg, respectively. The mean time to loss of consciousness (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score < 2) was 52.2 s. Three patients (12.0%) showed a reduction in systolic blood pressure of more than 30% from baseline.

conclusionsSelecting the appropriate dose of remimazolam/remifentanil without NMBAs makes it feasible to insert the I-gel.

trial registrationThis study protocol was registered at http://cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007801, 12th, October, 2022).

Indexed as

Neuromuscular Blocking AgentsPiperidinesAdultAnesthesia, GeneralBenzodiazepinesHumansRemifentanilBenzodiazepinesNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsPiperidinesRemifentanilremimazolamGeneral anesthesiaI-gel insertionNeuromuscular blocking agentsRemifentanilRemimazolam

Identifiers

PMID36927413
PMCPMC10018909
OpenAlexW4327685841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read55
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.