Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927339›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Protocol for a multicenter study on effectiveness and economics of the Back At work After Surgery (BAAS): a clinical pathway for knee arthroplasty.

Daniël O Strijbos, Geert van der Sluis, Wim F C van Houtert, A Carlien Straat, Yvonne van Zaanen, Stephan de Groot, Simon Klomp, Wim P Krijnen, Carolien M Kooijman, Igor van den Brand and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05690347 (Protocol for a Multicenter Study on), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05690347 unknown statusnot on this map

Protocol for a Multicenter Study on (Cost)Effectiveness of the Back At Work After Surgery (BAAS): a Clinical Pathway for Knee Arthroplasty

TypeobservationalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2022 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsArthropathy of KneeArmsBack At work After Surgery (BAAS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Daniël O StrijbosDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. d.o.strijbos@amsterdamumc.nl.
Geert van der SluisDepartment of Health Innovations, Nij Smellinghe Hospital Drachten, Compagnonsplein 1, Drachten, 9202 NN, the Netherlands.
Wim F C van HoutertDepartment of Health Innovations, Nij Smellinghe Hospital Drachten, Compagnonsplein 1, Drachten, 9202 NN, the Netherlands.
A Carlien StraatDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Yvonne van ZaanenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stephan de GrootElabo, Landdrostlaan 51, 7327 GM, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Simon Klompa.S.R. Insurances, Archimedeslaan 10, 3584 BA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wim P KrijnenHanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, Zernikeplein 7, 9747 AS, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Carolien M KooijmanDepartment of Health Innovations, Nij Smellinghe Hospital Drachten, Compagnonsplein 1, Drachten, 9202 NN, the Netherlands.
Igor van den BrandDepartment of Orthopaedics, Elizabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Doctor Deelenlaan 5, 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Michiel F RenemanDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tim A E J Boymans *Maastricht UMC +, Department of Orthopaedics, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
P Paul F M Kuijer *Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHanze University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLZiekenhuis Nij Smellinghe · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimizing return to work (RTW) after knee arthroplasty (KA) is becoming increasingly important due to a growing incidence of KA and poor RTW outcomes after KA. We developed the Back At work After Surgery (BAAS) clinical pathway for optimized RTW after KA. Since the effectiveness and cost analysis of the BAAS clinical pathway are still unknown, analysis on effectiveness and costs of BAAS is imperative.

methodThis protocol paper has been written in line with the standards of Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trails. To assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for RTW, we will perform a multicenter prospective cohort study with patients who decided to receive a total KA (TKA) or an unicompartmental KA (UKA). To evaluate the effectiveness of BAAS regarding RTW, a comparison to usual care will be made using individual patient data on RTW from prospectively performed cohort studies in the Netherlands. DISCUSSION: One of the strengths of this study is that the feasibility for the BAAS clinical pathway was tested at first hand. Also, we will use validated questionnaires and functional tests to assess the patient's recovery using robust outcomes. Moreover, the intervention was performed in two hospitals serving the targeted patient group and to reduce selection bias and improve generalizability. The limitations of this study protocol are that the lead author has an active role as a medical case manager (MCM) in one of the hospitals. Additionally, we will use the data from other prospective Dutch cohort studies to compare our findings regarding RTW to usual care. Since we will not perform an RCT, we will use propensity analysis to reduce the bias due to possible differences between these cohorts. TRAIL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrails.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05690347 , date of first registration: 19-01-2023).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCohort StudiesCritical PathwaysHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesReturn to WorkClinical trial protocolHealth plan implementationKnee arthroplastyOccupational health serviceOrthopedicsPhysical modalitiesReturn to work

Identifiers

PMID36927339
PMCPMC10018987
OpenAlexW4327683187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.