Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36927216›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2023

Estimating individualized treatment rules in longitudinal studies with covariate-driven observation times.

Janie Coulombe, Erica Em Moodie, Susan M Shortreed, Christel Renoux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janie CoulombeDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5531-841X
Erica Em MoodieDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Susan M ShortreedBiostatistics Unit, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Christel RenouxLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

Improved tailoring of depression care using customized clinical decision supportR01MH114873 · NIMH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MOODIE, ERICA, SHORTREED, SUSAN M · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sequential treatment decisions made by physicians to treat chronic diseases are formalized in the statistical literature as dynamic treatment regimes. To date, methods for dynamic treatment regimes have been developed under the assumption that observation times, that is, treatment and outcome monitoring times, are determined by study investigators. That assumption is often not satisfied in electronic health records data in which the outcome, the observation times, and the treatment mechanism are associated with patients' characteristics. The treatment and observation processes can lead to spurious associations between the treatment of interest and the outcome to be optimized under the dynamic treatment regime if not adequately considered in the analysis. We address these associations by incorporating two inverse weights that are functions of a patient's covariates into dynamic weighted ordinary least squares to develop optimal single stage dynamic treatment regimes, known as individualized treatment rules. We show empirically that our methodology yields consistent, multiply robust estimators. In a cohort of new users of antidepressant drugs from the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink, the proposed method is used to develop an optimal treatment rule that chooses between two antidepressants to optimize a utility function related to the change in body mass index.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalHumansLongitudinal Studiescovariate-driven observation times,confoundingindividualized treatment ruleOne-stage dynamic treatment regimerepeated measures

Identifiers

PMID36927216
PMCPMC10248307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.