ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2023
Sex Disparities in Diagnostic Evaluation and Revascularization in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction-A 15-Year Nationwide Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in cardiac structure and function following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Article
- Sex-specific outcomes in myocardial infarction: a dual-cohort analysis using clinical and real-world data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
- Gender-based differences among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients in Egypt: secondary analysis from the ACCA-EAPCI ESC-STEMI registry.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Acute coronary syndromes: mechanisms, challenges, and new opportunities.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Racial and Ethnic and Sex Disparities in the Outcomes and Treatment of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Analysis From the United States.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Advanced Therapeutic Interventions for Intermediate- and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.Clinical therapeutics · 2024Article
- National Trends in Aspirin Use and Expenditures in the United States: Analysis of The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2000-2021.Cardiology and therapy · 2024Article
- Lipid-Lowering Treatment Gaps in Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Using Global Database TriNetX.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve Utilization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Sex and Racial Disparities in Proportionate Mortality of Premature Myocardial Infarction in the United States: 1999 to 2020.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Sex differences in outcomes after acute coronary syndrome vary with age: a New Zealand national study.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2024Article
- Complications in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome with Contemporary Care.Cardiology · 2024Observational
- Sex differences in the management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome-Still an issue of equal treatment?Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023Review
- Validation of ICD-10-CM Diagnostic Codes for Identifying Patients with ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a National Health Insurance Claims Database.Clinical epidemiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Although sex disparities in the diagnostic evaluation and revascularization of patients with acute myocardial infarction are well documented, no study has evaluated longitudinal trends in these disparities. Methods and Results Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2019, 9 259 932 patients with acute myocardial infarction were identified. We divided 15 years into five 3-year periods. The primary objective was to evaluate sex-based trends in the use of diagnostic angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) among patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) over 15 years. The secondary objective was to evaluate sex disparities in mortality, length of stay, and cost. For non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, we saw a small reduction in sex disparity in the use of all diagnostic angiography in period 5 versus period 1 (4% versus 5.3%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.