Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36926735›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2023

Survival of rat sciatic nerve segments preserved in storage solutions

Liwen Zhou, Monzer Alatrach, Ted Zhao, Paul Oliphint, George D Bittner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liwen ZhouDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Monzer AlatrachDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Ted ZhaoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Paul OliphintDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
George D BittnerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Creative Commons · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most organ or tissue allografts with viable cells are stored in solutions ex vivo for hours to several days. Most allografts then require rapid host revascularization upon transplantation to maintain donor-cell functions (e.g., cardiac muscle contractions, hepatic secretions). In contrast, peripheral nerve allografts stored ex vivo do not require revascularization to act as scaffolds to guide outgrowth by host axons at 1-2 mm/d, likely aided by viable donor Schwann cells. Using current storage solutions and protocols, axons in all these donor organ/tissue/nerve transplants are expected to rapidly become non-viable due to Wallerian degeneration within days. Therefore, ex vivo storage solutions have not been assessed for preserving normal axonal functions, i.e., conducting action potentials or maintaining myelin sheaths. We hypothesized that most or all organ storage solutions would maintain axonal viability. We examined several common organ/tissue storage solutions (University of Wisconsin Cold Storage Solution, Normosol-R, Normal Saline, and Lactated Ringers) for axonal viability in rat sciatic nerves ex vivo as assessed by maintaining: (1) conduction of artificially-induced compound action potentials; and (2) axonal and myelin morphology in a novel assay method. The ten different storage solution conditions for peripheral nerves with viable axons (PNVAs) differed in their solution composition, osmolarity (250-318 mOsm), temperature (4°C vs. 25°C), and presence of calcium. Compound action potentials and axonal morphology in PNVAs were best maintained for up to 9 days ex vivo in calcium-free hypotonic diluted (250 mOsm) Normosol-R (dNR) at 4°C. Surprisingly, compound action potentials were maintained for only 1-2 days in UW and NS at 4°C, a much shorter duration than PNVAs maintained in 4°C dNR (9 days) or even in 25°C dNR (5 days). Viable axons in peripheral nerve allografts are critical for successful polyethylene glycol (PEG)-fusion of viable proximal and distal ends of host axons with viable donor axons to repair segmental-loss peripheral nerve injuries. PEG-fusion repair using PNVAs prevents Wallerian degeneration of many axons within and distal to the graft and results in excellent recovery of sensory/motor functions and voluntary behaviors within weeks. Such PEG-fused PNVAs, unlike all other types of conventional donor transplants, are immune-tolerated without tissue matching or immune suppression. Preserving axonal viability in stored PNVAs would enable the establishment of PNVA tissue banks to address the current shortage of transplantable nerve grafts and the use of stored PEG-fused PNVAs to repair segmental-loss peripheral nerve injuries. Furthermore, PNVA storage solutions may enable the optimization of ex vivo storage solutions to maintain axons in other types of organ/tissue transplants.

Indexed as

axonal morphometricsaxonal viabilitycalciumosmolarityperipheral nerve graftsperipheral nerve injurytemperaturetissue storage solutionstonicityWallerian degeneration

Identifiers

PMID36926735
PMCPMC10233786
OpenAlexW4317629373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.