Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36926502›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in health services2023

Design and management considerations for control groups in hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials: Narrative review & case studies.

Magdalena Jurczuk, Ranee Thakar, Fran E Carroll, Lizzie Phillips, Jan van der Meulen, Ipek Gurol-Urganci, Nick Sevdalis

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in health services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magdalena JurczukCentre for Quality Improvement and Clinical Audit, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.
Ranee ThakarObstetrics & Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Fran E CarrollCentre for Quality Improvement and Clinical Audit, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.
Lizzie PhillipsCentre for Quality Improvement and Clinical Audit, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.
Jan van der MeulenDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ipek Gurol-UrganciCentre for Quality Improvement and Clinical Audit, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.
Nick SevdalisCentre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies allow researchers to combine study of a clinical intervention's effectiveness with study of its implementation with the aim of accelerating the translation of evidence into practice. However, there currently exists limited guidance on how to design and manage such hybrid studies. This is particularly true for studies that include a comparison/control arm that, by design, receives less implementation support than the intervention arm. Lack of such guidance can present a challenge for researchers both in setting up but also in effectively managing participating sites in such trials. This paper uses a narrative review of the literature (Phase 1 of the research) and comparative case study of three studies (Phase 2 of the research) to identify common themes related to study design and management. Based on these, we comment and reflect on: (1) the balance that needs to be struck between fidelity to the study design and tailoring to emerging requests from participating sites as part of the research process, and (2) the modifications to the implementation strategies being evaluated. Hybrid trial teams should carefully consider the impact of design selection, trial management decisions, and any modifications to implementation processes and/or support on the delivery of a controlled evaluation. The rationale for these choices should be systematically reported to fill the gap in the literature.

Indexed as

comparative case study, implementation science, effectiveness-implementationhybrid trial designsnarrative reviewstudy designstudy management

Identifiers

PMID36926502
PMCPMC10012616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.