Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36926499›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2023

Theorizing is for everybody: Advancing the process of theorizing in implementation science.

Rosemary D Meza, James C Moreland, Michael D Pullmann, Predrag Klasnja, Cara C Lewis, Bryan J Weiner

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How Can Implementation Science Advance Behavioral Interventions in Preschool? A Scoping Review and Recommendations.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosemary D MezaKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
James C MorelandIndependent Researcher, Seattle, WA, United States.
Michael D PullmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Predrag KlasnjaSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Cara C LewisKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

Project 3P50MH126219 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DORSEY, SHANNON · 2021 to 2024
$5.9M
Optimizing Implementation in Cancer Control: OPTICC - Research Program CoreP50CA244432 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HANNON, MARGARET A, WEINER, BRYAN J. · 2019 to 2023
$4.6M
MECHANISMS: The MECHANics of Implementation Strategies and MeasureSR01CA262325 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEINER, BRYAN J. · 2021 to 2023
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244432NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262325NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH126219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a call to shift from treating theories as static products to engaging in a process of theorizing that develops, modifies, and advances implementation theory through the accumulation of knowledge. Stimulating theoretical advances is necessary to improve our understanding of the causal processes that influence implementation and to enhance the value of existing theory. We argue that a primary reason that existing theory has lacked iteration and evolution is that the process for theorizing is obscure and daunting. We present recommendations for advancing the process of theorizing in implementation science to draw more people in the process of developing and advancing theory.

Indexed as

causalitydeterminant prioritizationimplementation sciencemechanismstheorizing

Identifiers

PMID36926499
PMCPMC10012624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.