ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022
An improved saliency model of visual attention dependent on image content.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many visual attention models have been presented to obtain the saliency of a scene, i.e., the visually significant parts of a scene. However, some mechanisms are still not taken into account in these models, and the models do not fit the human data accurately. These mechanisms include which visual features are informative enough to be incorporated into the model, how the conspicuity of different features and scales of an image may integrate to obtain the saliency map of the image, and how the structure of an image affects the strategy of our attention system. We integrate such mechanisms in the presented model more efficiently compared to previous models. First, besides low-level features commonly employed in state-of-the-art models, we also apply medium-level features as the combination of orientations and colors based on the visual system behavior. Second, we use a variable number of center-surround difference maps instead of the fixed number used in the other models, suggesting that human visual attention operates differently for diverse images with different structures. Third, we integrate the information of different scales and different features based on their weighted sum, defining the weights according to each component's contribution, and presenting both the local and global saliency of the image. To test the model's performance in fitting human data, we compared it to other models using the CAT2000 dataset and the Area Under Curve (AUC) metric. Our results show that the model has high performance compared to the other models (AUC = 0.79 and sAUC = 0.58) and suggest that the proposed mechanisms can be applied to the existing models to improve them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.