Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36926370›Full record

ReviewHealth systems (Basingstoke, England)2023

Wait!What does that mean?: Eliminating ambiguity of delays in healthcare from an OR/MS perspective.

Maria Van Zyl-Cillié, Derya Demirtas, Erwin Hans

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health systems (Basingstoke, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Beyond the Queue: Exploring Waiting Practices in the Stories of Patients With Breast Cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Van Zyl-CilliéFaculty of Behaviourial Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3320-706X
Derya DemirtasFaculty of Behaviourial Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4064-484X
Erwin HansFaculty of Behaviourial Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6618-4661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waiting time in healthcare is a significant problem that occurs across the world and often has catastrophic effects. There are various terms used for waiting time ("sojourn", "throughput" etc.) and there is no consensus on how these terms are defined. Ambiguous definitions of waiting time make it difficult to compare and measure the problems related to waiting times and delays in healthcare. We present a systematic search and review of the Operations Research and Management Science (ORMS) literature on delays in healthcare services. We search for articles from 2004 to 2019 and base our search strategy on a well-known healthcare planning and control decision taxonomy. An important step towards reducing the ambiguity in the definitions is to distinguish between

Indexed as

access timehealthcare servicesoperations researchWaiting time

Identifiers

PMID36926370
PMCPMC10013540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.