Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36926317›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Effects of the visual environment on object localization in posterior cortical atrophy and typical Alzheimer's disease.

Dilek Ocal, Ian D McCarthy, Teresa Poole, Silvia Primativo, Tatsuto Suzuki, Nick Tyler, Chris Frost, Sebastian J Crutch, Keir X X Yong

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dilek OcalDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegeneration, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ian D McCarthyPedestrian Accessibility and Movement Environment Laboratory, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Teresa PooleDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegeneration, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Silvia PrimativoDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegeneration, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tatsuto SuzukiPedestrian Accessibility and Movement Environment Laboratory, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nick TylerPedestrian Accessibility and Movement Environment Laboratory, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chris FrostDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegeneration, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sebastian J CrutchDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegeneration, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Keir X X YongDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegeneration, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBUK Dementia Research Institute · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Visual processing deficits in Alzheimer's disease are associated with diminished functional independence. While environmental adaptations have been proposed to promote independence, recent guidance gives limited consideration to such deficits and offers conflicting recommendations for people with dementia. We evaluated the effects of clutter and color contrasts on performances of everyday actions in posterior cortical atrophy and memory-led typical Alzheimer's disease. Methods: 15 patients with posterior cortical atrophy, 11 with typical Alzheimer's disease and 16 healthy controls were asked to pick up a visible target object as part of two pilot repeated-measures investigations from a standing or seated position. Participants picked up the target within a controlled real-world setting under varying environmental conditions: with/without clutter, with/without color contrast cue and far/near target position. Task completion time was recorded using a target-mounted inertial measurement unit. Results: Across both experiments, difficulties locating a target object were apparent through patient groups taking an estimated 50-90% longer to pick up targets relative to controls. There was no evidence of effects of color contrast when locating objects from standing/seated positions and of any other environmental conditions from a standing position on completion time in any participant group. Locating objects, surrounded by five distractors rather than none, from a seated position was associated with a disproportionately greater effect on completion times in the posterior cortical atrophy group relative to the control or typical Alzheimer's disease groups. Smaller, not statistically significant but directionally consistent, ratios of relative effects were seen for two distractors compared with none. Discussion: Findings are consistent with inefficient object localization in posterior cortical atrophy relative to typical Alzheimer's disease and control groups, particularly with targets presented within reaching distance among visual clutter. Findings may carry implications for considering the adverse effects of visual clutter in developing and implementing environmental modifications to promote functional independence in Alzheimer's disease.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseclutterdementiaenvironmental modificationsobject localizationposterior cortical atrophyreachingvision

Identifiers

PMID36926317
PMCPMC10011642
OpenAlexW4323319967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read24
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.