Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36926292›Full record

ReviewMediastinum (Hong Kong, China)2023

Esophageal duplication cysts: a clinical practice review.

Jessica E Wahi, Fernando M Safdie

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Foregut mediastinal cysts: a narrative review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2026
    Review
  8. Factors Favoring Esophagectomy for Communicating Duplication Cysts.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advanced endoscopic techniques for esophageal duplication cyst treatment: beyond surgery.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fetal large tubular oesophageal duplication cyst: A case report.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica E WahiDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
Fernando M SafdieDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
Mount Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal duplication represents one of the most common types of bronchopulmonary foregut malformations. These rare congenital anomalies occur secondary to embryological aberrations between the 4th and 8th weeks of gestation. In order to be classified as an esophageal cyst a mediastinal cyst must have a close proximity with the esophagus, be lined by alimentary (squamous epithelium) or tracheobronchial mucosa and covered by two smooth muscle layers. These rare anomalies are often asymptomatic during adulthood. However, they can cause symptoms in early childhood, generally during the first 2 years of life. Variations in location, size, presence or absence of heterotopic mucosa, will dictate the clinical presentation. Dysphagia, food impaction, persistent cough and chest pain are common clinical presentations. Imaging studies including esophagram, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide key findings to reach the diagnosis. Nonetheless, endoscopic evaluation, particularly endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the most valuable tool to determine whether this lesion is cystic versus solid and or if there are abnormal mucosal findings. Needle biopsies are controversial but can help with drainage and to rule out malignant transformation. Therapeutic options include endoluminal drainage. However, more definitive therapies include surgical excision. Open and minimally invasive (laparoscopic and thoracoscopic) techniques have been demonstrated to be safe and effective at completely removing these lesions. Recently, robotic-assisted resections have gained more attention with case reports and series reporting excellent outcomes.

Indexed as

congenitalduplication cystEsophagusthoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36926292
PMCPMC10011867
OpenAlexW4318394993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.