ArticleCureus2023
Current Trends in Antifungal Prophylaxis for High-Risk Neonates in Neonatal Intensive Care Units in India: A Nationwide Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Prophylactic antifungals are often used in high-risk babies in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to reduce invasive fungal infections (IFIs). However, existing guidelines regarding prophylactic antifungal usage do not clearly define the high-risk population. This study aimed to assess the practices related to prophylactic antifungal use in NICUs in India. Methods For this cross-sectional study, an online structured questionnaire was completed by neonatologists who worked in level 3 NICUs in 12 states in India during the period June 2022 to August 2022. Results Data from 151 NICUs were analyzed. 71.7% of respondents were from private hospitals, and 28.3% were from government hospitals. Nearly one-fourth of the units (28.5%) used antifungal prophylaxis in all extremely low birth weight (ELBW) babies, while another one-fourth (25.8%) used a case-based approach. The remaining NICUs (45.7%) did not use prophylactic antifungals. Among the users, the preferred antifungal was fluconazole; 3 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg were the dosage regimens used. The commonly used interval for administering fluconazole was 72 hours (69.2% of units). The intravenous route was the preferred route of administration (84.1%). Factors that influenced the non-users were the low incidence of fungal infections in their NICUs and concern about the development of resistance. It was noted that the users felt strongly about the need for further recommendations from pediatric societies and more studies on the efficacy of antifungals. Conclusion There is considerable variation in the use of prophylactic antifungals across NICUs in India. Among the users, uniformity in the choice of antifungal and interval of administration was observed. Further recommendations from pediatric societies, including the definitions of neonates at-risk of fungal infections, are required to ensure consistency in practice and help clinicians decide whether or not to use prophylactic antifungals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.