ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Automatic detection and segmentation of postoperative cerebellar damage based on normalization.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI identifies disrupted cerebral development in medulloblastoma patients.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Secondary cerebro-cerebellar and intra-cerebellar dysfunction in cerebellar mutism syndrome.Neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Postoperative cerebellar mutism syndrome is an acquired autism-like network disturbance.Neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Cerebellar mutism is linked to midbrain volatility and desynchronization from speech cortices.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical resection is the gold standard in the treatment of pediatric posterior fossa tumors. However, surgical damage is often unavoidable and its association with postoperative complications is not well understood. A reliable localization and measure of cerebellar damage is fundamental to study the relationship between the damaged cerebellar regions and postoperative neurological outcomes. Existing cerebellum normalization methods are likely to fail on postoperative scans, therefore current approaches to measure postoperative damage rely on manual labelling. In this work, we develop a robust algorithm to automatically detect and measure cerebellum damage in postoperative 3D T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: In our approach, normal brain tissues are first segmented using a Bayesian algorithm customized for postoperative scans. Next, the cerebellum is isolated by nonlinear registration of a whole-brain template to the native space. The isolated cerebellum is then normalized into the spatially unbiased atlas (SUIT) space using anatomical information derived from the previous step. Finally, the damage is detected in the atlas space by comparing the normalized cerebellum and the SUIT template. Results: We evaluated our damage detection tool on postoperative scans of 153 patients with medulloblastoma based on inspection by human experts. We also designed a simulation to evaluate performance without human intervention and with an explicitly controlled and defined ground truth. Our results show that the approach performs adequately under various realistic conditions. Conclusions: We develop an accurate, robust, and fully automatic localization and measurement of cerebellar damage in the atlas space using postoperative MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.